From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bugs/regressions: report in LKML or in bugzilla?
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:28:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012072228.58728.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291755776.21627.13.camel@bwh-desktop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1359 bytes --]
Am Dienstag 07 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:12 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mardi 07 décembre 2010 à 16:39 +0100, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
> > > A participant of a linux performance training I hold found a bug
> > > with window scaling which did not receive any reply as well:
> > >
> > > Bug 20312 - System freeze with multiples of 32 in
> > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20312
> >
> > User bug ?
> >
> > Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> >
> > tcp_adv_win_scale - INTEGER
> >
> > Count buffering overhead as bytes/2^tcp_adv_win_scale
> > (if tcp_adv_win_scale > 0) or bytes-bytes/2^(-tcp_adv_win_scale),
> > if it is <= 0.
> > Default: 2
> >
> > Given we use 32bit numbers, using values outside of [-31 ... 31]
> > makes litle sense.
> >
> > We could add sysctl range limit, but user should not mess with
> > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/parameters unless he knows what he is doing ?
>
> [...]
>
> For mere humans, the range is not quite os obvious. Which is why this
> has been fixed in net-2.6 (as noted on that bug report now).
>
> Ben.
I verified the fix on 2.6.37-rc5.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 15:39 bugs/regressions: report in LKML or in bugzilla? Martin Steigerwald
2010-12-07 16:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-07 21:02 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-12-07 21:28 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2010-12-07 21:11 ` Martin Steigerwald
2010-12-07 17:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-12-07 21:04 ` Martin Steigerwald
2010-12-08 10:00 ` Florian Mickler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012072228.58728.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox