From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754466Ab0LGWk5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:40:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:39099 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754260Ab0LGWk4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:40:56 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=uy7NpTyuwK27gZlTrhzNWDG86kTRIaM2uOj3SSqRQsiensET+V4ykC4UCSO9wjYh62 ydUQcJsqz5V1xrPtTlANHWEjONsYtu2MTIdN8NLky0XmUAJh2RxchvLg2lUOjTJOPKjn IMmif91edZV0EDTnwb4ajSuM0+dAJVYDuAHGY= Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:40:40 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Peter Huewe Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joe Perches , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/udlfb: Fix sparse warning 'Using plain integer as NULL pointer' Message-ID: <20101207224039.GP10623@bicker> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Carpenter , Peter Huewe , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joe Perches , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1291760201-18531-1-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1291760201-18531-1-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:16:41PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > while ((pixel_end > pixel) && > (cmd_buffer_end - MIN_RLX_CMD_BYTES > cmd)) { > - uint8_t *raw_pixels_count_byte = 0; > - uint8_t *cmd_pixels_count_byte = 0; > - const uint16_t *raw_pixel_start = 0; > - const uint16_t *cmd_pixel_start, *cmd_pixel_end = 0; > + uint8_t *raw_pixels_count_byte = NULL; > + uint8_t *cmd_pixels_count_byte = NULL; > + const uint16_t *raw_pixel_start = NULL; > + const uint16_t *cmd_pixel_start, *cmd_pixel_end = NULL; > It would be better to delete these. The assignments are pointless and may well end up generating warnings in future versions of gcc. (Maybe it already does with beta versions of gcc?) > - struct fb_videomode fb_vmode = {0}; > + struct fb_videomode fb_vmode = {NULL}; Just do this: struct fb_videomode fb_vmode = {}; > struct usb_device *usbdev; > - struct dlfb_data *dev = 0; > - struct fb_info *info = 0; > + struct dlfb_data *dev = NULL; > + struct fb_info *info = NULL; > int retval = -ENOMEM; > int i; You could leave dev uninitialized here again. regards, dan carpenter