From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754098Ab0LHIFJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 03:05:09 -0500 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:38942 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750892Ab0LHIFH (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 03:05:07 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] Reclaim invalidated page ASAP Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , linux-mm , LKML , Wu Fengguang , Johannes Weiner , Nick Piggin In-Reply-To: <0724024711222476a0c8deadb5b366265b8e5824.1291568905.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com> References: <0724024711222476a0c8deadb5b366265b8e5824.1291568905.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20101208170504.1750.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:04:34 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > invalidate_mapping_pages is very big hint to reclaimer. > It means user doesn't want to use the page any more. > So in order to prevent working set page eviction, this patch > move the page into tail of inactive list by PG_reclaim. > > Please, remember that pages in inactive list are working set > as well as active list. If we don't move pages into inactive list's > tail, pages near by tail of inactive list can be evicted although > we have a big clue about useless pages. It's totally bad. > > Now PG_readahead/PG_reclaim is shared. > fe3cba17 added ClearPageReclaim into clear_page_dirty_for_io for > preventing fast reclaiming readahead marker page. > > In this series, PG_reclaim is used by invalidated page, too. > If VM find the page is invalidated and it's dirty, it sets PG_reclaim > to reclaim asap. Then, when the dirty page will be writeback, > clear_page_dirty_for_io will clear PG_reclaim unconditionally. > It disturbs this serie's goal. > > I think it's okay to clear PG_readahead when the page is dirty, not > writeback time. So this patch moves ClearPageReadahead. > > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim > Acked-by: Rik van Riel > Acked-by: Mel Gorman > Cc: Wu Fengguang > Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro > Cc: Johannes Weiner > Cc: Nick Piggin Until anyone should data, I will not ack this. This patch increase VM state, but benefit is doubious.