public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:33:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101210233329.GB1713@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101210225855.GJ2125@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 02:58:55PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:11:10PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > When a CPU is idle and others CPUs handled its extended
> > quiescent state to complete grace periods on its behalf,
> > it will catch up with completed grace periods numbers
> > when it wakes up.
> > 
> > But at this point there might be no more grace period to
> > complete, but still the woken CPU always keeps its stale
> > qs_pending value and will then continue to chase quiescent
> > states even if its not needed anymore.
> > 
> > This results in clusters of spurious softirqs until a new
> > real grace period is started. Because if we continue to
> > chase quiescent states but we have completed every grace
> > periods, rcu_report_qs_rdp() is puzzled and makes that
> > state run into infinite loops.
> > 
> > As suggested by Lai Jiangshan, just reset qs_pending if
> > someone completed every grace periods on our behalf.
> 
> Nice!!!
> 
> I have queued this patch, and followed it up with a patch that changes
> the condition to "rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask", which indicates that RCU
> needs a quiescent state from the CPU, and is valid regardless of how
> messed up the CPU is about which grace period is which.
> 
> I am making a similar change to the check in __note_new_gpnum().
> 
> Seem reasonable?

Look good yeah.

Thanks!

> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > Suggested-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcutree.c |    8 ++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index ccdc04c..8c4ed60 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -681,6 +681,14 @@ __rcu_process_gp_end(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_dat
> > 
> >  		/* Remember that we saw this grace-period completion. */
> >  		rdp->completed = rnp->completed;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If another CPU handled our extended quiescent states and
> > +		 * we have no more grace period to complete yet, then stop
> > +		 * chasing quiescent states.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (rdp->completed == rnp->gpnum)
> > +			rdp->qs_pending = 0;
> >  	}
> >  }
> > 
> > -- 
> > 1.7.3.2
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-10 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-10 21:11 [PATCH 0/2 v2] rcu: Fix series of spurious RCU softirqs Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-10 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-10 22:58   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-10 23:33     ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-12-10 21:14 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] rcu: Fix series of spurious RCU softirqs Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found] ` <1292015471-19227-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
2010-12-10 23:02   ` [PATCH 2/2] rcu: Keep gpnum and completed fields synchronized Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-10 23:39     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-10 23:47       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-11  0:04         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-11  0:15           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-11  0:58             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-11  1:21               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-11  6:36                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-11  0:00     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-11  0:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-11  0:51         ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101210233329.GB1713@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox