From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, paulus@samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, yakui.zhao@intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
ling.ma@intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, acme@ghostprotocols.net
Subject: perf monitoring triggers Was: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Print both of prefaulted and no prefaulted results by default
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:46:57 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101212134657.GA19166@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D03B1AD.7000606@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Em Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:15:25AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake escreveu:
> BTW, I found that measuring performance of prefaulted memcpy()
> with perf stat is difficult. Because current perf stat monitors
> whole execution of program or range of perf stat lifetime.
> If perf stat and monitored program can interact and work
> synchronously, it will be better.
> For example, if perf stat waits on the unix domain socket
> before create_perf_stat_counter() and monitored program wakes perf stat
> up through the socket, more fine grain monitoring will be possible.
> I imagine the execution will be like this:
> perf stat --wait-on /tmp/perf_wait perf bench mem memcpy --wake-up
> /tmp/perf_wait
> --wait-on is imaginaly option of perf stat, and the way of waking up
> perf stat is left to monitored program (in this case, --wake-up is
> used for specifying the name of the socket).
> I'd like to implement such a option to perf stat, how do you think?
Looks interesting, and also interesting would be to be able to place
probes that would wake up it too, for unmodified binaries to have
something similar.
Other kinds of triggers may be to hook on syscalls and when some
expression matches, like connecting to host 1.2.3.4, start monitoring,
stop when the socket is closed, i.e. monitor a connection lifetime, etc.
I think it is worth pursuing and encourage you to work on it :-)
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-12 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-29 16:01 [PATCH 1/2] perf bench: port memcpy_64.S to perf bench Hitoshi Mitake
2010-10-29 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf bench: add x86-64 specific benchmarks to perf bench mem memcpy Hitoshi Mitake
2010-10-30 19:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-01 5:36 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-01 9:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-05 17:05 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-10 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-12 15:01 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-12 15:02 ` [PATCH] perf bench: print both of prefaulted and no prefaulted results Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-18 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-25 7:04 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-25 7:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-26 10:30 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Print both of prefaulted and no prefaulted results by default tip-bot for Hitoshi Mitake
[not found] ` <4D03B1AD.7000606@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
2010-12-12 13:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2010-12-13 11:14 ` perf monitoring triggers Was: " Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-13 12:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-12-13 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-13 13:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-12-13 17:37 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-12-14 5:46 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf stat: wait on unix domain socket before calling sys_perf_event_open() Hitoshi Mitake
2010-12-14 5:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] perf bench: more fine grain monitoring for prefault memcpy() Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-25 7:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf bench: port arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S to perf bench mem memcpy Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-26 10:31 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Add feature that measures the performance of the arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S memcpy routines via 'perf bench mem' tip-bot for Hitoshi Mitake
2010-11-29 13:26 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2011-01-11 16:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf bench: add x86-64 specific benchmarks to perf bench mem memcpy Hitoshi Mitake
2010-10-29 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf bench: port memcpy_64.S to perf bench Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-30 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <4D0CE05C.1070600@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
2010-12-20 6:30 ` Miao Xie
2010-12-20 15:34 ` Hitoshi Mitake
[not found] ` <20101029210824.GB13385@ghostprotocols.net>
2010-11-05 17:10 ` Hitoshi Mitake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101212134657.GA19166@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ling.ma@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox