public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PM: Remove redundant checks from core device resume routines
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:31:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012130131.24970.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201012130128.31243.rjw@sisk.pl>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Since a separate list of devices is used to link devices that have
completed each stage of suspend (or resume), it is not necessary to
check dev->power.status in the core device resume routines any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 drivers/base/power/main.c |   34 +++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -485,20 +485,17 @@ void dpm_resume_noirq(pm_message_t state
 	transition_started = false;
 	while (!list_empty(&dpm_noirq_list)) {
 		struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_noirq_list.next);
+		int error;
 
 		get_device(dev);
-		if (dev->power.status > DPM_OFF) {
-			int error;
-
-			dev->power.status = DPM_OFF;
-			mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+		dev->power.status = DPM_OFF;
+		mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
 
-			error = device_resume_noirq(dev, state);
+		error = device_resume_noirq(dev, state);
 
-			mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
-			if (error)
-				pm_dev_err(dev, state, " early", error);
-		}
+		mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+		if (error)
+			pm_dev_err(dev, state, " early", error);
 		if (!list_empty(&dev->power.entry))
 			list_move_tail(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_suspended_list);
 		put_device(dev);
@@ -619,9 +616,6 @@ static void dpm_resume(pm_message_t stat
 	async_error = 0;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &dpm_suspended_list, power.entry) {
-		if (dev->power.status < DPM_OFF)
-			continue;
-
 		INIT_COMPLETION(dev->power.completion);
 		if (is_async(dev)) {
 			get_device(dev);
@@ -632,7 +626,7 @@ static void dpm_resume(pm_message_t stat
 	while (!list_empty(&dpm_suspended_list)) {
 		dev = to_device(dpm_suspended_list.next);
 		get_device(dev);
-		if (dev->power.status >= DPM_OFF && !is_async(dev)) {
+		if (!is_async(dev)) {
 			int error;
 
 			mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
@@ -697,15 +691,13 @@ static void dpm_complete(pm_message_t st
 		struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_prepared_list.prev);
 
 		get_device(dev);
-		if (dev->power.status > DPM_ON) {
-			dev->power.status = DPM_ON;
-			mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+		dev->power.status = DPM_ON;
+		mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
 
-			device_complete(dev, state);
-			pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+		device_complete(dev, state);
+		pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
 
-			mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
-		}
+		mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
 		if (!list_empty(&dev->power.entry))
 			list_move(&dev->power.entry, &list);
 		put_device(dev);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-13  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-13  0:28 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PM: Use separate lists of devices at each stage of suspend/resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13  0:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] PM: Use a different list of devices for each stage of device suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13  3:40   ` Alan Stern
2010-12-13  3:46     ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-12-13  0:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-12-13  1:34   ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PM: Remove redundant checks from core device resume routines Linus Torvalds
2010-12-13 22:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-14 10:37     ` Ming Lei
2010-12-14 19:58       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-15 14:12         ` Ming Lei
2010-12-13  0:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] PM: Replace the device power.status filed with a bit field Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13  0:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PM: Permit registrarion of parentless devices during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13  4:09   ` Alan Stern
2010-12-13 23:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-14  3:19       ` Alan Stern
2010-12-14 20:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-15  0:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-15 20:58           ` Alan Stern
2010-12-13  1:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PM: Use separate lists of devices at each stage of suspend/resume Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201012130131.24970.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox