From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PM: Remove redundant checks from core device resume routines
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:31:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012130131.24970.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201012130128.31243.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Since a separate list of devices is used to link devices that have
completed each stage of suspend (or resume), it is not necessary to
check dev->power.status in the core device resume routines any more.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -485,20 +485,17 @@ void dpm_resume_noirq(pm_message_t state
transition_started = false;
while (!list_empty(&dpm_noirq_list)) {
struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_noirq_list.next);
+ int error;
get_device(dev);
- if (dev->power.status > DPM_OFF) {
- int error;
-
- dev->power.status = DPM_OFF;
- mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ dev->power.status = DPM_OFF;
+ mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- error = device_resume_noirq(dev, state);
+ error = device_resume_noirq(dev, state);
- mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- if (error)
- pm_dev_err(dev, state, " early", error);
- }
+ mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ if (error)
+ pm_dev_err(dev, state, " early", error);
if (!list_empty(&dev->power.entry))
list_move_tail(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_suspended_list);
put_device(dev);
@@ -619,9 +616,6 @@ static void dpm_resume(pm_message_t stat
async_error = 0;
list_for_each_entry(dev, &dpm_suspended_list, power.entry) {
- if (dev->power.status < DPM_OFF)
- continue;
-
INIT_COMPLETION(dev->power.completion);
if (is_async(dev)) {
get_device(dev);
@@ -632,7 +626,7 @@ static void dpm_resume(pm_message_t stat
while (!list_empty(&dpm_suspended_list)) {
dev = to_device(dpm_suspended_list.next);
get_device(dev);
- if (dev->power.status >= DPM_OFF && !is_async(dev)) {
+ if (!is_async(dev)) {
int error;
mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
@@ -697,15 +691,13 @@ static void dpm_complete(pm_message_t st
struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_prepared_list.prev);
get_device(dev);
- if (dev->power.status > DPM_ON) {
- dev->power.status = DPM_ON;
- mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
+ dev->power.status = DPM_ON;
+ mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- device_complete(dev, state);
- pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+ device_complete(dev, state);
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
- mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
- }
+ mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
if (!list_empty(&dev->power.entry))
list_move(&dev->power.entry, &list);
put_device(dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-13 0:28 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PM: Use separate lists of devices at each stage of suspend/resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13 0:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] PM: Use a different list of devices for each stage of device suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13 3:40 ` Alan Stern
2010-12-13 3:46 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-12-13 0:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-12-13 1:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PM: Remove redundant checks from core device resume routines Linus Torvalds
2010-12-13 22:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-14 10:37 ` Ming Lei
2010-12-14 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-15 14:12 ` Ming Lei
2010-12-13 0:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] PM: Replace the device power.status filed with a bit field Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13 0:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PM: Permit registrarion of parentless devices during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13 4:09 ` Alan Stern
2010-12-13 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-14 3:19 ` Alan Stern
2010-12-14 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-15 0:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-15 20:58 ` Alan Stern
2010-12-13 1:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PM: Use separate lists of devices at each stage of suspend/resume Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012130131.24970.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox