From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:44:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101213144434.GB18577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=bw8EcxEffbVV6CfdAPVdM25ZMxHqAmz1yukq3@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27:02AM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20101209:
> >
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c:28: error: redefinition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog'
> > include/linux/nmi.h:22: note: previous definition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog' was here
I'll have to checkout that branch to see what got merged. I thought I
fixed all these. Is there a config I can use to duplicate these?
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> index c558e11..2056569 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
> {
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
NAK. This isn't the right patch. This chunk is in here because of
changes to nmi.h. Something broke in that file.
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-10 2:57 linux-next: Tree for December 10 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-10 17:25 ` linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog) Randy Dunlap
2010-12-12 5:27 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-12 6:26 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-12 7:32 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-13 14:44 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2010-12-13 23:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-14 15:07 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-14 5:42 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-13 15:37 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-13 15:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-12-13 19:02 ` linux-next: Tree for December 10 Zimny Lech
2010-12-13 19:04 ` Zimny Lech
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101213144434.GB18577@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox