From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched: Remove unlikely() from rt_policy() in sched.c
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:28:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101214012845.980133529@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101214012803.142630411@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0003-sched-Remove-unlikely-from-rt_policy-in-sched.c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
The rt_policy() has an unlikely() that the policy it is checking is
of RT priority (SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR).
According to the annotate branch profiler it is incorrect most of the time:
correct incorrect % Function File Line
------- --------- - -------- ---- ----
36667 654674 94 rt_policy sched.c 126
This makes sense because the rt_policy() is used by the sched_set_scheduler()
and nice(). Although users may use sys_nice a bit, all RT users use
the sched_set_scheduler() to set their RT priority, including kernel
threads.
The above numbers were from a normal desktop computer running
firefox, evolution, xchat and was part of a distcc compile farm.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index dc91a4d..269a045 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
static inline int rt_policy(int policy)
{
- if (unlikely(policy == SCHED_FIFO || policy == SCHED_RR))
+ if (policy == SCHED_FIFO || policy == SCHED_RR)
return 1;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-14 1:28 [PATCH 0/4] [GIT PULL] sched: Remove unlikely likelys Steven Rostedt
2010-12-14 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Cleanup pre_schedule_rt Steven Rostedt
2010-12-14 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Change pick_next_task_rt from unlikely to likely Steven Rostedt
2010-12-14 1:28 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-12-14 1:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Remove unlikely() from ttwu_post_activation Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101214012845.980133529@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox