From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:56:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216150920.866959114@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101216145602.899838254@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-change-ttwu-return.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5219 bytes --]
try_to_wake_up() would only return a success when it would have to
place a task on a rq, change that to every time we change p->state to
TASK_RUNNING, because that's the real measure of wakeups.
This results in that success is always true for the tracepoint, so
remove its success argument.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/trace/events/sched.h | 18 ++++++++----------
kernel/sched.c | 18 ++++++++----------
kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2327,10 +2327,10 @@ static inline void ttwu_activate(struct
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
}
-static inline void ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
- int wake_flags, bool success)
+static void
+ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int wake_flags)
{
- trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
+ trace_sched_wakeup(p);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ static inline void ttwu_post_activation(
}
#endif
/* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */
- if ((p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) && success)
+ if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
wq_worker_waking_up(p, cpu_of(rq));
}
@@ -2449,9 +2449,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
ttwu_activate(p, rq, wake_flags & WF_SYNC, orig_cpu != cpu,
cpu == this_cpu, en_flags);
- success = 1;
out_running:
- ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags, success);
+ ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
+ success = 1;
out:
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
put_cpu();
@@ -2470,7 +2470,6 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
- bool success = false;
BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
BUG_ON(p == current);
@@ -2485,9 +2484,8 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct
schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
}
ttwu_activate(p, rq, false, false, true, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
- success = true;
}
- ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0, success);
+ ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
}
/**
@@ -2649,7 +2647,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
- trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
+ trace_sched_wakeup_new(p);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
Index: linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -54,15 +54,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_stop_ret,
*/
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
- TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
- TP_ARGS(p, success),
+ TP_ARGS(p),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
__field( pid_t, pid )
__field( int, prio )
- __field( int, success )
__field( int, target_cpu )
),
@@ -70,25 +69,24 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_templat
memcpy(__entry->comm, p->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
__entry->pid = p->pid;
__entry->prio = p->prio;
- __entry->success = success;
__entry->target_cpu = task_cpu(p);
),
- TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d success=%d target_cpu=%03d",
+ TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d target_cpu=%03d",
__entry->comm, __entry->pid, __entry->prio,
- __entry->success, __entry->target_cpu)
+ __entry->target_cpu)
);
DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup,
- TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
- TP_ARGS(p, success));
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
+ TP_ARGS(p));
/*
* Tracepoint for waking up a new task:
*/
DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup_new,
- TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
- TP_ARGS(p, success));
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
+ TP_ARGS(p));
#ifdef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state(struct task_struct *p)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -399,8 +399,7 @@ static void wakeup_reset(struct trace_ar
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
-static void
-probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p, int success)
+static void probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct trace_array_cpu *data;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
index 8f758d0..bb1ba50 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_array *tr,
}
static void
-probe_sched_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *wakee, int success)
+probe_sched_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *wakee)
{
struct trace_array_cpu *data;
unsigned long flags;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-16 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-16 14:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched: Always provide p->oncpu Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 1:03 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mutex: Use p->oncpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-16 15:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-18 1:05 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 1:09 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 17:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 3:06 ` Yan, Zheng
2010-12-17 13:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 14:49 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-18 20:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-19 11:20 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-17 18:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:39 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:45 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101216150920.866959114@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox