public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:56:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216150920.866959114@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101216145602.899838254@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: sched-change-ttwu-return.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5219 bytes --]

try_to_wake_up() would only return a success when it would have to
place a task on a rq, change that to every time we change p->state to
TASK_RUNNING, because that's the real measure of wakeups.

This results in that success is always true for the tracepoint, so
remove its success argument.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 include/trace/events/sched.h      |   18 ++++++++----------
 kernel/sched.c                    |   18 ++++++++----------
 kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c |    3 +--
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2327,10 +2327,10 @@ static inline void ttwu_activate(struct 
 	activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
 }
 
-static inline void ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
-					int wake_flags, bool success)
+static void
+ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int wake_flags)
 {
-	trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
+	trace_sched_wakeup(p);
 	check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
 
 	p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ static inline void ttwu_post_activation(
 	}
 #endif
 	/* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */
-	if ((p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) && success)
+	if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
 		wq_worker_waking_up(p, cpu_of(rq));
 }
 
@@ -2449,9 +2449,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 	ttwu_activate(p, rq, wake_flags & WF_SYNC, orig_cpu != cpu,
 		      cpu == this_cpu, en_flags);
-	success = 1;
 out_running:
-	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags, success);
+	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
+	success = 1;
 out:
 	task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
 	put_cpu();
@@ -2470,7 +2470,6 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
 static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
-	bool success = false;
 
 	BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
 	BUG_ON(p == current);
@@ -2485,9 +2484,8 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct 
 			schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
 		}
 		ttwu_activate(p, rq, false, false, true, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
-		success = true;
 	}
-	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0, success);
+	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2649,7 +2647,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct
 
 	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
 	activate_task(rq, p, 0);
-	trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
+	trace_sched_wakeup_new(p);
 	check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
Index: linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -54,15 +54,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_stop_ret,
  */
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
 
-	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
+	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
 
-	TP_ARGS(p, success),
+	TP_ARGS(p),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__array(	char,	comm,	TASK_COMM_LEN	)
 		__field(	pid_t,	pid			)
 		__field(	int,	prio			)
-		__field(	int,	success			)
 		__field(	int,	target_cpu		)
 	),
 
@@ -70,25 +69,24 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_templat
 		memcpy(__entry->comm, p->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
 		__entry->pid		= p->pid;
 		__entry->prio		= p->prio;
-		__entry->success	= success;
 		__entry->target_cpu	= task_cpu(p);
 	),
 
-	TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d success=%d target_cpu=%03d",
+	TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d target_cpu=%03d",
 		  __entry->comm, __entry->pid, __entry->prio,
-		  __entry->success, __entry->target_cpu)
+		  __entry->target_cpu)
 );
 
 DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
-	     TP_ARGS(p, success));
+	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
+	     TP_ARGS(p));
 
 /*
  * Tracepoint for waking up a new task:
  */
 DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup_new,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
-	     TP_ARGS(p, success));
+	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
+	     TP_ARGS(p));
 
 #ifdef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state(struct task_struct *p)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -399,8 +399,7 @@ static void wakeup_reset(struct trace_ar
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
-static void
-probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p, int success)
+static void probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
index 8f758d0..bb1ba50 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_array *tr,
 }
 
 static void
-probe_sched_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *wakee, int success)
+probe_sched_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *wakee)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	unsigned long flags;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-16 14:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched: Always provide p->oncpu Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:03   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mutex: Use p->oncpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 17:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 19:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:17       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-16 15:23   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:45         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:35       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-18  1:05   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:09   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:31   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 17:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17  3:06             ` Yan, Zheng
2010-12-17 13:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 16:54             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:43               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:28                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 21:02                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 14:49                   ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-18 20:08                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-19 11:20                       ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-17 18:21                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:50               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 18:24                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:39     ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:45         ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101216150920.866959114@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox