From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@lab.zgora.pl>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rculist: fix borked __list_for_each_rcu() macro
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:51:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216155111.GC2203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101216060236.GB4826@mako-laptop>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:02:36AM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 03:20:05PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:11:12PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> > > This restores parentheses blance.
> >
> > Good catch, queued!!!
> >
> > This does not actually appear to be in use anywhere in the kernel any
> > more, so I queued this for 2.6.38 rather than in the 2.6.37 urgent queue.
> > So, just out of curiosity, how did you find this one?
>
> Some years ago I wrote a dumb script that walks trees of () and {}.
> It catches unbalanced trees. It's dumb enough to fail with #ifdef etc,
> but most of the time it does its job. It reaches unreachable code
> and unused one too.
Very cool, and thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> > Hmmm... Maybe we should just delete __list_for_each_rcu. ;-)
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@lab.zgora.pl>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/rculist.h | 2 +-
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
> > > index f31ef61..70d3ba5 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/rculist.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
> > > @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
> > > #define __list_for_each_rcu(pos, head) \
> > > for (pos = rcu_dereference_raw(list_next_rcu(head)); \
> > > pos != (head); \
> > > - pos = rcu_dereference_raw(list_next_rcu((pos)))
> > > + pos = rcu_dereference_raw(list_next_rcu(pos)))
> > >
> > > /**
> > > * list_for_each_entry_rcu - iterate over rcu list of given type
> > > --
> > > 1.7.0.4
> > >
>
> --
> Mariusz Kozlowski
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-16 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-15 22:11 [PATCH] rculist: fix borked __list_for_each_rcu() macro Mariusz Kozlowski
2010-12-15 23:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-16 6:02 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2010-12-16 7:38 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-16 15:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 10:10 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-17 15:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-16 15:51 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101216155111.GC2203@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mk@lab.zgora.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox