From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753585Ab0LQQRL (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:17:11 -0500 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:38017 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751917Ab0LQQRI (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:17:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:17:00 -0600 From: Serge Hallyn To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , LSM , James Morris , Kees Cook , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, kernel list , "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael Kerrisk Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] user namespaces: Add a user_namespace as creator/owner of uts_namespace Message-ID: <20101217161700.GA5926@peq> References: <20101217152246.GA8221@mail.hallyn.com> <20101217152458.GA11162@mail.hallyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@gmail.com): > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > >> +/* > >> + * userns count is 1 for root user, 1 for init_uts_ns, > >> + * and 1 for... ? > >> + */ > >>  struct user_namespace init_user_ns = { > >>        .kref = { > >> -               .refcount       = ATOMIC_INIT(2), > >> +               .refcount       = ATOMIC_INIT(3), > > > > +1 is for init_nsproxy ;-) > > Err, no. > > +1 is to ensure it's never freed, but since allocator will BUG_ON (?) if fed > with static object, maybe it's completely bogus. Right. On the one hand so long as it's high enough it doesn't really matter. But I think it's worth getting the # exactly right in order to help document what's going on. So I'll try dropping it back down to 2. thanks, -serge