From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] second preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:54:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101217205433.GA10199@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello!
This patchset contains RCU priority boosting for the tiny RCU
implementations and a number of fixes and cleanups. The patches
are as follows, with the first 12 being updates from the earlier
posting at https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/6/187:
1. Add rcutorture tests to check for correct priority boosting.
2-6. RCU priority boosting for the tiny RCU implementations.
RCU priority boosting for the tree RCU implementations is
in progress, but not yet ready for prime time.
7. Fix a few naming holdouts from old Classic RCU.
8. Move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c
(from Lai Jiangshan).
9. Simplify the RCU callback orphan/adopt code for CPU hotplug
(from Lai Jiangshan).
10. Update RCU tracing documentation to reflect patch #9.
11. Fix a race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited(),
but Tejun Heo has suggested another approach that might
be better longer term.
12. Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() spin for a bit to avoid
blocking -- again, there may be a better long-term fix.
That said, this adaptive approach seems to work very well
in practice.
13. Improve synchronize_sched_expedited()'s ability to batch
concurrent requests, as foreshadowed above.
14-15. Make RCU avoid looking for quiescent states in cases when
they are not required, thereby improving RCU's energy
efficiency (from Frederic Weisbecker).
16. Enlist the rnp->qsmask data to simplify #14 and #15 and
also handle another case where RCU was unnecessarily asking
CPUs to go through quiescent states.
17. Limit tree RCU's leaf-level fanout to reduce lock contention.
Lock contention is higher at the leaf level that elsewhere
in the tree of rcu_node structures due to the fact that
CPUs synchronize at the leaf level to detect grace-period
events.
18. Reduce tree RCU's leaf-level lock contention still further
by making __call_rcu() less aggressive about starting new
grace periods. The aggression is a holdover from ancient
times predating synchronize_rcu_expedited().
19. Fix a mismatched-parentheses error in __list_for_each_rcu()
(from Mariusz Kozlowski).
20. Given that there are no in-tree users, remove the aforementioned
__list_for_each_rcu(). This is maintained as a separate
commit in case there is a use out there somewhere making its
way into mainline. (Though I would rather keep this API
out -- list_for_each_entry_rcu() is much better in most cases.)
For a testing-only version of this patchset from git, please see:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git rcu/testing
Thanx, Paul
Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 12 -
b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 132 +++++++++++-
b/include/linux/init_task.h | 9
b/include/linux/rculist.h | 2
b/include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1
b/include/linux/rcutiny.h | 8
b/include/linux/rcutree.h | 1
b/include/linux/sched.h | 11 -
b/init/Kconfig | 39 +++
b/kernel/rcutiny.c | 71 +++++-
b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 15 -
b/kernel/rcutorture.c | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
b/kernel/rcutree.c | 81 +------
b/kernel/rcutree.h | 16 -
b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 71 ++++++
b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 8
b/kernel/sched.c | 69 ------
b/kernel/srcu.c | 8
include/linux/rculist.h | 5
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 5
include/linux/rcutree.h | 1
init/Kconfig | 16 +
kernel/rcutiny.c | 70 ++----
kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 444 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/rcutree.c | 95 ++++++--
kernel/rcutree.h | 45 ++--
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 110 +++++++---
kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 4
29 files changed, 1272 insertions(+), 350 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-17 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-17 20:54 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/20] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/20] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/20] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/20] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/20] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 19:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: increase synchronize_sched_expedited() batching Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 16:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-19 9:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-19 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-20 13:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-20 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-21 7:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Keep gpnum and completed fields synchronized Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20 2:13 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-12-20 2:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-20 16:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: fine-tune grace-period begin/end checks Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/20] rcu: limit rcu_node leaf-level fanout Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: reduce __call_rcu()-induced contention on rcu_node structures Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/20] rculist: fix borked __list_for_each_rcu() macro Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: remove unused " Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101217205433.GA10199@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox