public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:58:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101218125850.24d4e604@absol.kitzblitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217145117.75a28ae0@absol.kitzblitz>

* Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 05:48:18PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> speedtch directly uses the internal timer and work members of a struct
> >> delayed_work.  Use a separate work item and timer instead.
> 
> >> This is part of a series to remove flush_scheduled_work() usage to
> >> prepare for deprecation of flush_scheduled_work().  Patches in this
> >> series are self contained and mostly straight-forward
> 
> I tested this patch with 2.6.37-rc6. Not sure whether 
> I'm doing something wrong, but I failed to start the
> PPP daemon with my speedtouch usb:

I narrowed down my problem, and noticed that speedtch_atm_start
never returns, but gets stuck trying to start status polling.

Now when I delete this mod_timer, everything appears to work
nicely at my place. With additional debug output:


Dec 18 12:24:40 absol kernel: ATM dev 0: speedtch_atm_start entered
Dec 18 12:24:40 absol kernel: ATM dev 0: speedtch_start_synchro entered
Dec 18 12:24:40 absol kernel: ATM dev 0: speedtch_start_synchro: modem prodded. 2 bytes returned: 00 00
 Dec 18 12:24:40 absol kernel: return from speedtch_start_synchro
 Dec 18 12:24:40 absol kernel: return from speedtch_atm_start

Dec 18 12:24:49 absol pppd[4844]: Plugin pppoatm.so loaded.
Dec 18 12:24:49 absol pppd[4844]: PPPoATM plugin_init
Dec 18 12:24:49 absol pppd[4844]: PPPoATM setdevname_pppoatm - SUCCESS:8.48
Dec 18 12:24:49 absol pppd[4845]: pppd 2.4.4 started by root, uid 0
Dec 18 12:24:49 absol pppd[4845]: using channel 1
Dec 18 12:24:49 absol pppd[4845]: Using interface ppp0
Dec 18 12:24:49 absol pppd[4845]: Connect: ppp0 <--> 8.48

Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: ATM dev 0: speedtch_handle_int entered
Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: ATM dev 0: DSL line goes up
 Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: return from speedtch_handle_int
 Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: entered speedtch_check_status
 Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: entered speedtch_read_status
 Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: return from speedtch_read_status
Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: ATM dev 0: speedtch_check_status: line state 0x20
Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: ATM dev 0: ADSL line is up (6176 kb/s down | 512 kb/s up)
 Dec 18 12:24:54 absol kernel: return from speedtch_check_status


Best regards,
Nicolas Kaiser

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
---
 drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c b/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
index b591906..e6d8847 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
@@ -686,9 +686,6 @@ static int speedtch_atm_start(struct usbatm_data *usbatm, struct atm_dev *atm_de
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Start status polling */
-	mod_timer(&instance->status_check_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.2.2

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-18 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-12 16:48 [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] init: don't call flush_scheduled_work() from do_initcalls() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] ioc4: use static work_struct for ioc4_load_modules() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] media/video: explicitly flush request_module work Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] media/video: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 21:30   ` Greg KH
2010-12-17 11:05     ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] usb: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-17 13:51 ` speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-18 11:58   ` Nicolas Kaiser [this message]
2010-12-18 16:32   ` [PATCH UPDATED 5/6] " Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 17:59     ` Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-24 15:14 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101218125850.24d4e604@absol.kitzblitz \
    --to=nikai@nikai.net \
    --cc=duncan.sands@free.fr \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox