public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: taskstats alignment...
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:16:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101224211529.GA19019@bicker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D14EA49.3070005@suse.com>

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 01:45:29PM -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
v> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 12/23/2010 12:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > Re: commit 4be2c95d1f7706ca0e74499f2bd118e1cee19669
> > 
> > Pretty much every 64-bit architecture other than
> > powerpc64 and x86-64 needs that code, not just
> > IA64.
> > 
> > Better check would be:
> > 
> > CONFIG_64BIT && !CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> > 
> > Otherwise we'll be twiddling that ifdef endlessly as each
> > and every other 64-bit platform bumps into this issue.
> > 
> > So please could you change this to use a more sane check?
> 
> I don't have an objection to it, but I've been pushing that we make the
> change universal from the beginning of the discussion.
> 
> The issue is that it causes breakage on apps that aren't following the
> interface properly. iotop, in particular, has hard-coded offsets into
> the packet to fish out the taskstats structure.
> 
> So, if the goal of not breaking x86_64 is good enough, I'm fine with
> this change.

Didn't you say something along the lines that if they don't have
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS then there is a warning message
printed in dmesg?  I thought that was what prompted you to change the
alignment in the first place.  It sound like those arches are already
broken so David's suggestion would be a clear improvement over the 
current code.

BTW, since you're redoing the patch, it would be good if you pasted the
warning message into the changelog.

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-24 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-23 17:30 taskstats alignment David Miller
2010-12-24 18:45 ` Jeff Mahoney
2010-12-24 21:16   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2010-12-25  2:18     ` Jeff Mahoney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101224211529.GA19019@bicker \
    --to=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox