From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, sparseirq: let nr_irqs equal to NR_IRQS
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:42:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101228174204.GB13488@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D193533.6060103@kernel.org>
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 04:54:11PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
>
> For x86_64 system:
> when we have 128 cpus with 5 ioapics, will have nr_irqs = 3064
> 120 + 8 * 128 + 120 * 16
> systems could take 20 pcie, when intel 10g are used with
> sriov and ixgbevf, every vf will need 3 irqs, and one device
> have 64 vf. so will need 20 * 3 * 64 = 3840.
> some 6 ports Intel 10gb may need more.
>
> Just remove that function for x86, and let nr_irqs to NR_IRQS
> because We already have radix-tree and bit_map for searching desc for irq.
Won't that make the arch_probe_nr_irqs be NR_IRQS_LEGACY?
I am looking at Linus's today tree, or is this patch based on some other tree?
>
> Notes: long before same vresion cause one of Ingo's setup udev hang...
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 22 ----------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -3637,28 +3637,6 @@ int get_nr_irqs_gsi(void)
> return nr_irqs_gsi;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> -int __init arch_probe_nr_irqs(void)
> -{
> - int nr;
> -
> - if (nr_irqs > (NR_VECTORS * nr_cpu_ids))
> - nr_irqs = NR_VECTORS * nr_cpu_ids;
> -
> - nr = nr_irqs_gsi + 8 * nr_cpu_ids;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) || defined(CONFIG_HT_IRQ)
> - /*
> - * for MSI and HT dyn irq
> - */
> - nr += nr_irqs_gsi * 16;
> -#endif
> - if (nr < nr_irqs)
> - nr_irqs = nr;
> -
> - return NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static int __io_apic_set_pci_routing(struct device *dev, int irq,
> struct io_apic_irq_attr *irq_attr)
> {
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-28 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 9:21 [PATCH] sparseirq: Increase nr_irqs if needed Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <4CF75626.6000306@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012021019060.2653@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <4CF7FA58.8070803@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012022112400.2653@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <4CF7FF66.3010802@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012022125401.2653@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <20101222125711.GI10809@elte.hu>
2010-12-28 0:54 ` [PATCH] x86, sparseirq: let nr_irqs equal to NR_IRQS Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 17:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2010-12-28 21:24 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101228174204.GB13488@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox