From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/17] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq()
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:31:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101229143136.GC2728@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101224123742.887559254@chello.nl>
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 01:23:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In preparation of calling select_task_rq() without rq->lock held, drop
> the dependency on the rq argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> @@ -3416,27 +3409,22 @@ void sched_exec(void)
> {
> struct task_struct *p = current;
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct rq *rq;
> int dest_cpu;
>
> - rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
> - dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(rq, p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
Seems this should go to patch 07/17 ;)
> + dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0);
> if (dest_cpu == smp_processor_id())
> goto unlock;
>
> - /*
> - * select_task_rq() can race against ->cpus_allowed
> - */
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
> - likely(cpu_active(dest_cpu)) && migrate_task(p, rq)) {
> + if (likely(cpu_active(dest_cpu)) && need_migrate_task(p)) {
If we drop rq_lock, need_migrate_task() maybe return true but
p is already running on other cpu. Thus we do a wrong migration
call.
Thanks,
Yong
> struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu };
>
> - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
> - stop_one_cpu(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop, &arg);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> + stop_one_cpu(task_cpu(p), migration_cpu_stop, &arg);
> return;
> }
> unlock:
> - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> }
>
> #endif
> @@ -5681,7 +5669,7 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_str
> goto out;
>
> dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, new_mask);
> - if (migrate_task(p, rq)) {
> + if (need_migrate_task(p)) {
> struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu };
> /* Need help from migration thread: drop lock and wait. */
> __task_rq_unlock(rq);
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct ta
> * preempt must be disabled.
> */
> static int
> -select_task_rq_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
> +select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
> {
> struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> static int
> -select_task_rq_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
> +select_task_rq_idle(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
> {
> return task_cpu(p); /* IDLE tasks as never migrated */
> }
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -973,11 +973,18 @@ static void yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
> static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task);
>
> static int
> -select_task_rq_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
> +select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
> {
> if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
> return smp_processor_id();
>
> +#if 0
> + /*
> + * XXX without holding rq->lock the below is racy, need to
> + * rewrite it in a racy but non-dangerous way so that we mostly
> + * get the benefit of the heuristic but don't crash the kernel
> + * if we get it wrong ;-)
> + */
> /*
> * If the current task is an RT task, then
> * try to see if we can wake this RT task up on another
> @@ -1002,6 +1009,7 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
>
> return (cpu == -1) ? task_cpu(p) : cpu;
> }
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * Otherwise, just let it ride on the affined RQ and the
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
> @@ -9,8 +9,7 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> static int
> -select_task_rq_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> - int sd_flag, int flags)
> +select_task_rq_stop(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
> {
> return task_cpu(p); /* stop tasks as never migrate */
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-29 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-24 12:23 [RFC][PATCH 00/17] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/17] sched: Always provide p->on_cpu Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/17] mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/17] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/17] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/17] x86: Optimize arch_spin_unlock_wait() Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-03 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 6:45 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-05 19:14 ` [RFC][PATCH] spinlock: Kill spin_unlock_wait() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 19:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-05 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-06 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-06 10:38 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-06 18:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-07 21:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 21:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-01-07 21:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/17] sched: Provide p->on_rq Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-29 14:14 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/17] sched: Serialize p->cpus_allowed and ttwu() using p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-29 14:20 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-03 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/17] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-29 14:31 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-01-03 11:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-03 14:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-03 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-03 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-03 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-03 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 7:27 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-04 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 5:59 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-04 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-03 18:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-04 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/17] sched: Remove rq argument to sched_class::task_waking() Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/17] sched: Add TASK_WAKING to task_rq_lock Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/17] sched: Delay task_contributes_to_load() Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/17] sched: Also serialize ttwu_local() with p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-03 17:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-09 23:11 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/17] sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu() Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/17] sched: Remove rq argument to ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-29 14:40 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-03 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/17] sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/17] sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-03 14:36 ` [RFC][PATCH] sembench: add stddev to the burn stats Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/17] sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-04 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 15:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-04 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 16:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-24 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/17] sched: Sort hotplug vs ttwu queueing Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-29 14:51 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-03 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-24 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/17] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v3 Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101229143136.GC2728@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox