From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
shaohui.zheng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between 32 and 64bit
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101230124800.GD18831@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012281240000.8883@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:43:24PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> This has been almost entirely rewritten in x86/numa by c1c3443c ("x86,
> numa: Fake node-to-cpumask for NUMA emulation") and the pending fix
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129340072128297 ("x86, numa: Fix
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS without NUMA"). Since this is only moving those
> functions to numa.c, it should be trivial to fix once based on x86/numa.
Sigh, the new NUMA emulation thing is 64bit only. :-( I'll see if it
can be applied to 32bit too. BTW, how does this interact with the
Shaohui's patchset. Isn't that about NUMA emulation too? Are these
the same patches?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-30 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-28 11:48 [PATCHSET REPOST] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 01/16] x86: Kill unused static boot_cpu_logical_apicid in smpboot.c Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 02/16] x86: Rename x86_32 MAX_APICID to MAX_LOCAL_APIC Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 03/16] x86: Make default_send_IPI_mask_sequence/allbutself_logical() 32bit only Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 04/16] x86: Replace cpu_2_logical_apicid[] with early percpu variable Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 05/16] x86: Always use x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid for cpu -> logical apic id Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 06/16] x86: Kill apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 07/16] x86: Add apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 08/16] x86: Implement the default x86_32_early_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 09/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for bigsmp_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 10/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for summit_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 11/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for numaq_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 12/16] x86: Replace apic->apicid_to_node() with ->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:35 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-29 10:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-29 19:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-29 22:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 11:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 14/16] x86: Unify CPU -> " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:39 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 12:48 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-12-30 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-31 13:20 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-31 23:09 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 18:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 16/16] x86: Unify NUMA initialization " Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-23 13:37 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#5 Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 17:49 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#4 Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101230124800.GD18831@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).