From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753875Ab0L3MsI (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:48:08 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:57511 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761Ab0L3MsG (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:48:06 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=W8/wwE1Jc406x14Y/k/h850D1aC5GlSwSGamM1qfrlQkZN0U22hhuVlHGXjLity8BO +hkyKqbywJPyTAMmd32AxKoRRsC+1Msx5Xl8DzTvEcCnh1eiU+AeD59mQXenRaS+0fK8 2zMPtp24m+4fqqnYrkdY3GdcdqD/3DIHOhO28= Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:48:00 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: David Rientjes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, yinghai@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, Pekka Enberg , shaohui.zheng@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between 32 and 64bit Message-ID: <20101230124800.GD18831@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1293536929-31683-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1293536929-31683-16-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:43:24PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > This has been almost entirely rewritten in x86/numa by c1c3443c ("x86, > numa: Fake node-to-cpumask for NUMA emulation") and the pending fix > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129340072128297 ("x86, numa: Fix > CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS without NUMA"). Since this is only moving those > functions to numa.c, it should be trivial to fix once based on x86/numa. Sigh, the new NUMA emulation thing is 64bit only. :-( I'll see if it can be applied to 32bit too. BTW, how does this interact with the Shaohui's patchset. Isn't that about NUMA emulation too? Are these the same patches? Thanks. -- tejun