Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ext4 tree

Jiri Kosina
2009-11-25T11:56:49Z

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, tytso@mit.edu wrote:

> > > Today's linux-next merge of the trivial tree got a conflict in
> > > fs/ext4/balloc.c between commit 4433871130f36585fde38e7dd817433296648945
> > > ("ext4: fold ext4_free_blocks() and ext4_mb_free_blocks()") from the ext4
> > > tree and commit 15dcf8433b514d1dc1b80d87a0798c2db2c37e95 ("tree-wide: fix
> > > some typos and punctuation in comments") from the trivial tree.
> > >
> > > The former moved the comment fixed by the latter and fixed the typo along
> > > the way.
> >
> > Dropped the mballoc hunk from my queue, thanks.
>
> You mean balloc hunk, I hope. (In the commit in question, I moved the
> comment from fs/ext4/balloc.c to fs/ext4/mballoc.c.)

Yup, sorry, I have been looking at completely different patch while
writing the mail and got side-tracked.

Anyway, the conflict between ext4 and trivial trees should be gone now.

Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.