From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932123Ab1ACPju (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:39:50 -0500 Received: from imr4.ericy.com ([198.24.6.8]:47378 "EHLO imr4.ericy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755343Ab1ACPjt (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:39:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 07:38:49 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: "R, Durgadoss" CC: "Yu, Fenghua" , "khali@linux-fr.org" , "Brown, Len" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" Subject: Re: Patch[1/2]X86:Adding_Notification_Support_to_therm_throt.c Message-ID: <20110103153849.GA25747@ericsson.com> References: <20110103150328.GB25600@ericsson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:11:59AM -0500, R, Durgadoss wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > > > From: Durgadoss R > > > > > > Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:42:45 +0530 > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] X86:Adding_core_threshold_notification_to_therm_throt.c > > > > > > This patch adds code to therm_throt.c to notify core thermal threshold > > > events. These thresholds are supported by the IA32_THERM_INTERRUPT register. > > > The status/log for the same is monitored using the IA32_THERM_STATUS > > register. > > > The necessary #defines are in msr-index.h. A call back is added to mce.h, to > > > further notify the thermal stack, about the threshold events. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Durgadoss R > > > > > If this is just a resubmit, you might instead consider trying to figure out > > why none of the x86 maintainers replied. Documentation/Submit* might help, > > as well as comparing your set of patches with other (accepted) patches. > > > > This is a resubmission. I thought people might be on holidays..that's why > resubmitted today. Anyway, I shall try to figure out the reason. Thanks > for pointing it out Guenter.. > > Any comments on the hwmon patch 2/2 ? > Not right now. Futile to spend more time on it unless the x86 changes are accepted. Guenter