From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Move error handling to the end of mc13xxx_probe
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 21:05:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110103200524.GA25121@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294047419.25173.2.camel@mola>
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:36:59PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> To improve readability, move error handling to the end of mc13xxx_probe.
I like the way it was done before (obviously as I wrote the code).
Though I don't feel strongly against the move. Still I prefer the more
explicit error labels.
On a scale between -1 and 1 it would get a -0 from me.
Best regards
Uwe
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
> index b9fcaf0..18c29fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
> @@ -732,28 +732,21 @@ static int mc13xxx_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>
> ret = mc13xxx_identify(mc13xxx, &id);
> if (ret || id == MC13XXX_ID_INVALID)
> - goto err_revision;
> + goto err;
>
> /* mask all irqs */
> ret = mc13xxx_reg_write(mc13xxx, MC13XXX_IRQMASK0, 0x00ffffff);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_mask;
> + goto err;
>
> ret = mc13xxx_reg_write(mc13xxx, MC13XXX_IRQMASK1, 0x00ffffff);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_mask;
> + goto err;
>
> ret = request_threaded_irq(spi->irq, NULL, mc13xxx_irq_thread,
> IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "mc13xxx", mc13xxx);
> -
> - if (ret) {
> -err_mask:
> -err_revision:
> - mc13xxx_unlock(mc13xxx);
> - dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, NULL);
> - kfree(mc13xxx);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
>
> mc13xxx_unlock(mc13xxx);
>
> @@ -785,6 +778,11 @@ err_revision:
> }
>
> return 0;
> +err:
> + mc13xxx_unlock(mc13xxx);
> + dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, NULL);
> + kfree(mc13xxx);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int __devexit mc13xxx_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> --
> 1.7.2
>
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-03 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-03 9:36 [PATCH] mfd: Move error handling to the end of mc13xxx_probe Axel Lin
2011-01-03 20:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110103200524.GA25121@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=axel.lin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox