From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] regulator MAX8998/LP3974: Support DVS-GPIO.
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:44:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104134434.GC24774@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=dJ83par+U8YfbpC3HVjEkc9rfPU8pxSFN_mTb@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:16:56PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Is it desirable to define all four for BUCK1 and two for BUCK2 DVS
> > voltages in platform code?
> In case a system with 4 buck1 preset voltages and 2 buck2 preset
> voltages, it is desirable. :)
I suspect Lukasz's question is more why this would be useful; I can
imagine that the main reason would be performance and in any case I
don't see it hurting to have the option.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-23 8:53 [PATCH v3 0/4] MFD MAX8998/LP3974 Driver Update MyungJoo Ham
2010-12-23 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] MFD MAX8998/LP3974: Support Hibernation MyungJoo Ham
2010-12-24 11:38 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-12-23 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD MAX8998/LP3974: Support LP3974 RTC MyungJoo Ham
2010-12-24 11:38 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-01-04 5:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] MFD MAX8998/LP3974 Driver Update MyungJoo Ham
2011-01-04 5:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] MFD MAX8998/LP3974: Support LP3974 RTC MyungJoo Ham
2011-01-04 13:40 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-11 11:22 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-01-04 5:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] regulator MAX8998/LP3974: Support DVS-GPIO MyungJoo Ham
2011-01-04 7:49 ` Lukasz Majewski
2011-01-04 8:16 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-01-04 13:44 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-01-11 11:22 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-01-04 5:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] MFD MAX8998/LP3974: Support Charger MyungJoo Ham
2011-01-04 13:56 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-05 0:43 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-01-14 5:22 ` [PATCH v5] " MyungJoo Ham
2011-01-18 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-23 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] regulator MAX8998/LP3974: Support DVS-GPIO MyungJoo Ham
2010-12-24 11:36 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-01-02 13:56 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-23 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] MFD MAX8998/LP3974: Support Charger MyungJoo Ham
2010-12-24 11:37 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110104134434.GC24774@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox