From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751328Ab1ADNqJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 08:46:09 -0500 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:47748 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751026Ab1ADNqH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 08:46:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:44:35 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: MyungJoo Ham Cc: Lukasz Majewski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , Alessandro Zummo , Kyungmin Park , Joonyoung Shim Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] regulator MAX8998/LP3974: Support DVS-GPIO. Message-ID: <20110104134434.GC24774@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20101224113805.GI27832@sortiz-mobl> <1294118261-18906-3-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <20110104084904.5765cd9e@lmajewski.digital.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Reply hazy, ask again later. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:16:56PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Is it desirable to define all four for BUCK1 and two for BUCK2 DVS > > voltages in platform code? > In case a system with 4 buck1 preset voltages and 2 buck2 preset > voltages, it is desirable. :) I suspect Lukasz's question is more why this would be useful; I can imagine that the main reason would be performance and in any case I don't see it hurting to have the option.