From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 03/18] sched: Change the ttwu success details
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:59:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104150102.460900901@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110104145929.772813816@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-change-ttwu-return.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2431 bytes --]
try_to_wake_up() would only return a success when it would have to
place a task on a rq, change that to every time we change p->state to
TASK_RUNNING, because that's the real measure of wakeups.
This results in that success is always true for the tracepoints.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 18 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2383,10 +2383,10 @@ static inline void ttwu_activate(struct
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
}
-static inline void ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
- int wake_flags, bool success)
+static void
+ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int wake_flags)
{
- trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
+ trace_sched_wakeup(p, true);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ static inline void ttwu_post_activation(
}
#endif
/* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */
- if ((p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) && success)
+ if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
wq_worker_waking_up(p, cpu_of(rq));
}
@@ -2505,9 +2505,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
ttwu_activate(p, rq, wake_flags & WF_SYNC, orig_cpu != cpu,
cpu == this_cpu, en_flags);
- success = 1;
out_running:
- ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags, success);
+ ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
+ success = 1;
out:
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
put_cpu();
@@ -2526,7 +2526,6 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
- bool success = false;
BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
BUG_ON(p == current);
@@ -2541,9 +2540,8 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct
schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
}
ttwu_activate(p, rq, false, false, true, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
- success = true;
}
- ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0, success);
+ ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
}
/**
@@ -2705,7 +2703,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
- trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
+ trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, true);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-04 14:59 [RFC][PATCH 00/18] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v4 Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/18] sched: Always provide p->on_cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/18] mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/18] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/18] sched: Provide p->on_rq Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 8:13 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-05 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-29 0:10 ` Frank Rowand
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/18] sched: Serialize p->cpus_allowed and ttwu() using p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/18] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-06 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-06 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/18] sched: Remove rq argument to sched_class::task_waking() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/18] sched: Delay task_contributes_to_load() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/18] sched: Also serialize ttwu_local() with p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/18] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-05 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-29 0:21 ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-03 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-03 17:49 ` Frank Rowand
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/18] sched: Drop rq->lock from first part of wake_up_new_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/18] sched: Drop rq->lock from sched_exec() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/18] sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-06 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-29 1:05 ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-03 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/18] sched: Remove rq argument from ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/18] sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-29 1:08 ` Frank Rowand
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/18] sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 21:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-06 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-07 15:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-18 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 19:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-29 0:04 ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-03 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/18] sched: Sort hotplug vs ttwu queueing Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 20:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-06 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 15:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/18] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v4 Ingo Molnar
2011-01-29 1:20 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110104150102.460900901@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox