From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 3/5] ftrace trace event add missing semicolumn
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 04:10:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105031016.GI2911@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12932.1294196493@localhost>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:01:33PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 03:08:02 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker said:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:18:37PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > > > > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > > > > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > > > > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
> > > > > #undef DEFINE_EVENT
> > > > > #define DEFINE_EVENT(template, name, proto, args) \
> > > > > static struct ftrace_event_call __used \
> > > > > - __attribute__((__aligned__(4))) event_##name
> > > > > + __attribute__((__aligned__(4))) event_##name;
>
> > > Adding this semicolumn here ensures that all Ftrace macros are consistent wrt
> > > semicolumns. We can get away without consistency currently exactly because the
> > > current scheme adds many useless semicolumns between each TRACE_EVENT().
>
> > Are you sure you want to put so much time on this?
>
> > This will require a massive change for the sole win of removing double ";"
> > in generated code. This won't optimize much the build, and it will make the things
> > not so much more readable for very rare people who dare to have interest into the
> > TRACE_EVENT generated code. That notwithstanding the obfuscation of that generated
> > code resides more in the lack of indentation and newlines than in double
> > semicolons that we barely notice.
>
> Can DEFINE_EVENT ever be sensibly used in a context where the additional ; will
> cause an issue (for instance, a hypothetical array initialization like:
>
> static struct events[] = {DEFINE_EVENT(..), DEFINE_EVENT(...) }
You can't do the above as DEFINE_EVENT() do more than just creating a structure.
It can define functions and so.
Plus it doesn't behave the same whether CREATE_TRACE_POINTS is defined or not:
it can either define or declare the functions and structures.
> or other places we usually do the 'do { X } while (0)' trick to make the code legal?
I just can't figure out a sane case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-05 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-04 23:16 [RFC patch 0/5] Trace event fixes and cleanups Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-04 23:16 ` [RFC patch 1/5] trace event block fix unassigned field Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 15:09 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-05 19:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 19:57 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-04 23:16 ` [RFC patch 2/5] trace event skb " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-04 23:16 ` [RFC patch 3/5] ftrace trace event add missing semicolumn Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 0:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-05 0:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 2:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-05 2:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 2:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-05 13:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 15:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-05 19:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 23:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-05 23:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-06 18:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 3:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-01-05 3:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2011-01-05 6:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-01-05 13:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-04 23:16 ` [RFC patch 4/5] tracepoint trace event add missing comma Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-04 23:16 ` [RFC patch 5/5] trace event sched: remove TP_perf_assign Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-05 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 13:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110105031016.GI2911@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox