public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: cgroup scheduling: Adding kthreadd to a non-RT cgroup can deadlock the kernel
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:54:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105045447.GN23414@ksplice.com> (raw)

Hi,

I've found a bug where, on CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED systems, adding the kthreadd
task to a cgroup with cpu.rt_runtime_us = 0 (as some cgroup configuration
scripts do, when they move all processes into a default cgroup), can result in
deadlocks in the kernel.

On 2.6.37, the problem can be triggered via CPU hotplug. The following sequence
of events will deadlock on an SMP system:

1. Add kthreadd to a cpu cgroup with rt_runtime_us = 0
2. echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
3. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
4. echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
5. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

In line (3), the CPU hotplug will cause us to create a new ksoftirqd/1
thread. Since that thread is forked from kthreadd, it will end up in the same
cgroup, also without any realtime access.

In step (4), cpu_callback in softirq.c will attempt to kill ksoftirqd by setting
it to SCHED_FIFO and using kthread_stop(). It does this with
'sched_setscheduler_nocheck', which bypasses the usual checks that prevent
setting a process to an SCHED_FIFO if it is in a cgroup that would prevent it
from running.

Thus, ksoftirqd ends up at SCHED_FIFO but with a zero rt_runtime_us, and is
never scheduled again, and kthread_stop blocks waiting on it.

In (5), we try to call the CPU notifier chain again, but it is still locked from
(4), and we deadlock.

For reasons I don't fully understand, just adding ksoftirqd/1 to a cgroup and
then taking CPU 1 offline doesn't result in a hang, so I think there may be some
detail of this situation I don't fully understand, but I'm pretty confident in
the general analysis.

Before 2.6.34, we can trigger a similar problem just by adding kthreadd to a
cgroup and then calling stop_machine (e.g. by removing a module), since
stop_machine created a new RT workqueue on each invocation. This is how I first
found this problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/693594

- Nelson

             reply	other threads:[~2011-01-05  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-05  4:54 Nelson Elhage [this message]
2011-01-05  6:01 ` cgroup scheduling: Adding kthreadd to a non-RT cgroup can deadlock the kernel Mike Galbraith
2011-01-05  9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 15:02   ` Nelson Elhage
2011-01-05 15:18     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110105045447.GN23414@ksplice.com \
    --to=nelhage@ksplice.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox