public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] panic:  ratelimit panic messages
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:21:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105132108.GE10129@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294198711-15492-2-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>


* Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:

> Sometimes when things go bad, so much spew is coming on the console it is hard
> to figure out what happened.  This patch allows you to ratelimit the panic
> messages with the intent that the first panic message will provide the info
> we need to figure out what happened.
> 
> Adds new kernel param 'panic_ratelimit=on/<integer in seconds>'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    6 ++++++
>  kernel/panic.c                      |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Well, but it's not just panics that can occur repeatedly (in fact panics tend to 
trigger once), but recursive/repeated oopses.

So if we try to do some sort of 'show first crash, rate-limit afterwards' thing (i'm 
still not 100% sure about the wiseness of it) then we should cover all common 
occurances of system panics/crashes.

btw., while printk-delay exists and can serve a similar purpose, it's pretty 
cumbersome for panic ratelimit: it slows down bootups extremely, and it also slows 
down regular, harmless printks.

So having some sort of rate-limit for emitting crash screens may make sense, while 
also preserving the oops counter or at least some other notification that we 'lost' 
messages.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-05 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-05  3:38 [PATCH 0/2] touch_nmi_watchdog semantic changes Don Zickus
2011-01-05  3:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] panic: ratelimit panic messages Don Zickus
2011-01-05 13:21   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-01-05 14:00     ` Don Zickus
2011-01-05 22:51   ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-06  2:05     ` Don Zickus
2011-01-06  2:16       ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-15  8:29     ` Dave Young
2011-01-15 11:03       ` Dave Young
2011-01-05  3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: touch_nmi_watchdog should only touch local cpu not every one Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110105132108.GE10129@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox