From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] staging: tidspbridge for 2.6.38
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:57:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105235748.GB22850@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikWpxq+35pLN_r6B214jcO2Ss2rEv0KA9bcMJFL@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:47:47PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:15:43AM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> This is the first pull request of changes for tidspbridge driver for 2.6.38,
> >> I expect to make another request with at least one bug fix, but in the mean
> >> time here it is the content for this one:
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit 90a8a73c06cc32b609a880d48449d7083327e11a:
> >>
> >> Linux 2.6.37-rc7 (2010-12-21 11:26:40 -0800)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >> git://dev.omapzoom.org/pub/scm/tidspbridge/kernel-dspbridge.git dspbridge
> >
> > Ick, no. Why did you base this on -rc7? My staging-next branch is
> > based on -rc5 at the moment, and I really see no need to merge the rest
> > of them into the tree for no good reason at all.
>
> wrongly though staging-next would be at rc7+ at the time you could
> take a look to the patches
Why would I want to sync it? You can (and should) always go off of my
current staging-next tree if you are wanting me to take a git pull.
It's ok if it is an older version, fast-forwards are just fine.
> > Also, as you did send this before the merge window closed, but during
> > the holidays, I couldn't get to it. But in looking at this, it's going
> > to have to wait for the next window, sorry, it's just too big, and too
> > late. You weren't expecting me to be working on kernel stuff during my
> > holiday break, were you?
>
> No I wasn't :)
>
> > So, feel free to redo this against 2.6.38-rc1 when that comes out.
>
> No problem then, but could you consider a 2nd pull with a compilation
> fix (which will be introduced in 2.6.38, right now present in
> linux-next), and a bug fix.
I'll always take patches for bugfixes, but please wait for after I sync
my current tree with Linus before I can do anything with it.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-05 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-24 8:15 [GIT PULL] staging: tidspbridge for 2.6.38 Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-01-05 21:18 ` Greg KH
2011-01-05 23:47 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-01-05 23:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110105235748.GB22850@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox