From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753382Ab1AGOK0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:10:26 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:59488 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752776Ab1AGOJ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:09:59 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: "Guan Xuetao" , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 11/12] unicore32 core architecture: signals Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 01:16:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.35-16-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <00da01cba465$6d6e52f0$484af8d0$@mprc.pku.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: <00da01cba465$6d6e52f0$484af8d0$@mprc.pku.edu.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101070116.57654.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:DCngbGtF+VSfQepXhH22gwWJAYyqf5Yc/sH3UbmXqj6 V63V9SoCdOtaVd/1+XHLve2YHPmvXE4KFXwFvBoPdVIYmgfbpA k/D1EiM7A3JiznnvrtT6yWtckVWe/pi3ExVsrqg/dr6zARbJhI C00I7xM1PRzP/Rp1nwj8GcGEb93nJpMherOo5XHH//OTMjdbnP bbi+cXJBxK3qGB/ppqaKQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 25 December 2010, Guan Xuetao wrote: > From: Guan Xuetao > > Patch 11 implements signals. > > Signed-off-by: Guan Xuetao > --- > arch/unicore32/include/asm/sigcontext.h | 61 ++++ > arch/unicore32/kernel/signal.c | 571 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/unicore32/kernel/signal.h | 16 + > 3 files changed, 648 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Al Viro recently did a major cleanup of the signal handling code in a number of architectures. He can probably give much better feedback on this one than I can. The one thing that sticks out to me is that you implement both legacy and rt signals, where new architectures should generally only need the rt variant. Arnd