public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
To: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@linux.intel.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, trenn@suse.de,
	kent.liu@intel.com, chaohong.guo@intel.com,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] apic: Fix error interrupt report at all APs
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:04:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110107020402.GA14593@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110106092753.GA32343@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com>

> If the thermal interrupt vector of all CPUs is 0 and you are seeing
> LAPIC error interrupts, the correct way to fix it is to disable digital
> thermal sensors from generating interrupts.
Thanks for your feedback Yong!

No. Write LVT with vector(0~15) will always generate error interrupt if error
interrupt is set. it has nothing with digital thermal device.
Since you find some platform will cause issue because BIOS possible take
over the thermal interrupt.

So my prefered patch is like following, move the APIC_LVTTHMR restore to
vecotor check domain, which following your origin logic.

Can I consider BIOS under control thermal interrupt will not be illegal vector?


diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
index 4b68326..a2cb9bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -405,30 +405,28 @@ void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 */
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, l, h);
 
-	/*
-	 * The initial value of thermal LVT entries on all APs always reads
-	 * 0x10000 because APs are woken up by BSP issuing INIT-SIPI-SIPI
-	 * sequence to them and LVT registers are reset to 0s except for
-	 * the mask bits which are set to 1s when APs receive INIT IPI.
-	 * Always restore the value that BIOS has programmed on AP based on
-	 * BSP's info we saved since BIOS is always setting the same value
-	 * for all threads/cores
-	 */
-	apic_write(APIC_LVTTHMR, lvtthmr_init);
-
 	h = lvtthmr_init;
-
-	if ((l & MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_TM1) && (h & APIC_DM_SMI)) {
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG
-		       "CPU%d: Thermal monitoring handled by SMI\n", cpu);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	/* Check whether a vector already exists */
 	if (h & APIC_VECTOR_MASK) {
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG
 		       "CPU%d: Thermal LVT vector (%#x) already installed\n",
 		       cpu, (h & APIC_VECTOR_MASK));
+		/*
+	 	 * The initial value of thermal LVT entries on all APs always reads
+	 	 * 0x10000 because APs are woken up by BSP issuing INIT-SIPI-SIPI
+	 	 * sequence to them and LVT registers are reset to 0s except for
+	 	 * the mask bits which are set to 1s when APs receive INIT IPI.
+	 	 * Always restore the value that BIOS has programmed on AP based on
+	 	 * BSP's info we saved since BIOS is always setting the same value
+	 	 * for all threads/cores
+	 	*/
+		apic_write(APIC_LVTTHMR, h);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if ((l & MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_TM1) && (h & APIC_DM_SMI)) {
+		printk(KERN_DEBUG
+		       "CPU%d: Thermal monitoring handled by SMI\n", cpu);
 		return;
 	}
 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-06 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-06  3:28 [PATCH 0/2] apic: Fix error interrupt report at all APs Youquan Song
2011-01-06  3:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Youquan Song
2011-01-06  3:28   ` [PATCH 2/2] apic: Add print error interrupt reason Youquan Song
2011-01-06  4:34     ` Joe Perches
2011-01-06 22:13       ` Jason Baron
2011-01-06  9:27   ` [PATCH 1/2] apic: Fix error interrupt report at all APs Yong Wang
2011-01-07  2:04     ` Youquan Song [this message]
2011-01-07  2:01       ` Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110107020402.GA14593@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com \
    --to=youquan.song@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chaohong.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kent.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox