From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753649Ab1AJQgQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:36:16 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:58657 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752883Ab1AJQgO (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:36:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:35:56 -0500 From: "Ted Ts'o" To: Lukas Czerner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sandeen@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix possible overflow in ext4_trim_fs() Message-ID: <20110110163556.GB3128@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ted Ts'o , Lukas Czerner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sandeen@redhat.com References: <1290694277-29462-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <20101220123521.GH23626@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:25:05PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > Actually the patch is not enough, there is still a possibility for > overflow to happen. Jan Kara notice the same bug in ext3 batched discard > implementation. I am sorry for this, I'll sen updated patch ASAP. > This isn't a new patch, and not a replacement for the previous one, correct? - Ted