From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754637Ab1AKUwZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:52:25 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52593 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752441Ab1AKUwW (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:52:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:52:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20110111.125254.133402589.davem@davemloft.net> To: stefani@seibold.net Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com, jj@chaosbits.net, daniel.baluta@gmail.com, jochen@jochen.org, hagen@jauu.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, pavel@ucw.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1294779020.16410.2.camel@wall-e> References: <1294764515-15356-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net> <1294765273.2927.65.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1294779020.16410.2.camel@wall-e> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stefani Seibold Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:50:20 +0100 > Right, but currently there is no need for an IPV6 implementation, non of > our base station provide it and non of our mobile network customers use > it. > > If it will be required in the future it will be implemented. We require that you implement the ipv6 side for the submission right now. Long gone are the days when we add ipv4 only implementations of protocols.