linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"rdunlap@xenotime.net" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
	Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add an option to disable decoding of MCE
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:48:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110111224809.GA20839@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQNnxnoFPWjh6cHp_x9ZayDdcXdV+qbee8XK_r@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:51:57PM -0500, Mike Waychison wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org> wrote:
> > Ok, let me preface this with an even easier suggestion: Can you simply
> > not compile EDAC (which includes CONFIG_EDAC_DECODE_MCE) in your kernels
> > and the whole issue with decoding disappears simply because no module
> > registers as a decoder...?
> 
> The trouble here is that default_decode_mce() is still getting called
> no matter what :(  It didn't really cause problems until you added
> atomic_notifier_call_chain(&x86_mce_decoder_chain, 0, &m) to
> machine_check_poll().

Yeah, I figured as much... after hitting send :(. Feel free to add my

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>

to your patch.

> > Right, and this means that you need to know all the memory controller
> > topologies of all the different architectures and also the SPD accessing
> > based on a board type could be a pain. One of the main reasons for
> > fleshing out MCE decoding in the kernel was to avoid needless trouble
> > like that.
> 
> It's not that painful for us.  Our firmware guys own this userland
> code :)  I can see it being a pain for others however.

Yeah, what we actually need is a chipset-agnostic way (ACPI maybe?)
of mapping chip selects to the actual DIMMs so all that above can be
avoided...

> Doing this all in userland does have it's upsides as well fwiw. For
> example, MC4 is usually kept around across a reset, which means
> that the firmware can pick it up when the system goes down due to a
> processor context corruption.

True, although not always reliable due to that context corruption. Tony
Luck is adding code for writing the error information to a persistent
storage _before_ you reset so on platforms with such a device you'll
be able to look at MC4 (or any of the MCE regs, for that matter) after
reset, which, I think, would make error analysis much more convenient.
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=129356804427008&w=2.

> We rely on these libraries as well to decode egregious uncorrectable
> memory errors as well as bus errors (like hypertransport sync floods).

Yeah, I don't think error decoding would help, at least on AMD, with
uncorrectable errors causing syncflood. We might do something about it
though :).

> > I've
> > heard similar troubles reported by other big server farm people and
> > what I'm currently working on is a RAS daemon that hooks into perf thus
> > enabling persistent performance events. This way, you could open a
> > debugfs file (this'll move to sysfs someday) and read the same decoded
> > data by mmaping the perf ringbuffer.
> 
> I'll definitely keep an eye out for your developments with RAS :)

Cool, I think I have the bulk of your requirements now, from your and
Duncan's mails. I'm always open for other suggestions too.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-11 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-10 22:46 [PATCH] x86: Add an option to disable decoding of MCE Mike Waychison
2011-01-10 22:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-01-10 23:03   ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-11  6:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2011-01-11 19:56       ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-11 20:49         ` Borislav Petkov
2011-01-11 21:51           ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-11 22:48             ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-01-11 23:19               ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-12 17:12               ` Tony Luck
2011-01-11 22:07         ` Duncan Laurie
2011-01-14  0:07         ` Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110111224809.GA20839@aftab \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=dlaurie@google.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).