public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:32:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110121193240.GA13581@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110121170847.GH2832@htj.dyndns.org>

* Tejun Heo (tj@kernel.org) wrote:
[...]
> > (note: packed here along with "aligned" does _not_ generate ugly
> > bytewise read/write memory ops like "packed" alone. The use of
> > "packed" is to let the compiler down-align the structure to the
> > value requested, instead of uselessly aligning it on 32-byte if it
> > chooses to.)
> 
> Yeah, good point.  :-)

For the records, I just noticed that "packed, aligned(8)" can generate unaligned
accesses on sparc64 by removing the padding between a "int" and a following
pointer. So we should not use it.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-21 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-06 20:45 [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 0/4] this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 21:08   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-06 21:43     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 22:05   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-07 15:15     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-07 18:04       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-07 18:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-08 17:24           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-09  8:33             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-21  7:31             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-21  9:26               ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:31                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 15:48                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 16:30                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 16:34                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 16:54                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:07                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:50                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 18:06                           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:37                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:08                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 17:13                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 17:19                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24  6:01                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-25 13:09                               ` Pekka Enberg
2011-02-25 13:19                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 16:26                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 16:37                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 16:43                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 16:38                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-25 16:45                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:24                           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:42                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:50                               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:10                                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 18:42                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:31                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 18:46                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 19:32                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2011-01-23 18:00                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 2/4] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() support Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 3/4] slub: Get rid of slab_free_hook_irq() Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 4/4] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110121193240.GA13581@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox