From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753404Ab1AVOrK (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:47:10 -0500 Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:46974 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753154Ab1AVOrI (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:47:08 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:47:04 +0000 From: Chris Ball To: Pierre Tardy Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pierre Tardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: remove anti clock gating quirk for wl1271 Message-ID: <20110122144704.GA13182@void.printf.net> References: <20110120041412.GA5274@void.printf.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:17:51AM +0100, Pierre Tardy wrote: > > > > currently generate any warnings, so it would be good to avoid adding new > > ones, though I understand why it might make sense in this case. > Yes, this is supposed to be used by future user patches. > > Do you suggest to add __attribute__ ((unused)), or we just completly > remove those and will add them whenever we have user? Yes, let's go with __attribute__ ((unused)) for now. Thanks! -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child