From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751783Ab1AVUzm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:55:42 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:52528 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750738Ab1AVUzk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:55:40 -0500
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:55:35 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
        Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@google.com>,
        Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidb@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support
Message-ID: <20110122205535.GD8666@infradead.org>
References: <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop>
 <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop>
 <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster>
 <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop>
 <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster>
 <AANLkTi=L+MW5-KLP_TKSxhstD8JEtBW=RKci5wSbZsd6@mail.gmail.com>
 <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster>
 <AANLkTikVDn+W8t7KSym5tCGZowyYvoLFrk8d0mumiRF-@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110121234930.GK3043@thunk.org>
 <1295684398.19231.47.camel@jaguar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1295684398.19231.47.camel@jaguar>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:19:58AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Sure, it would have been nicer for everyone involved if Daniel would
> have kept the original patches and added new patches to clean it up on
> top of that to preserve the history.

No, it would be a complete fucking mess that way.  We tell people to
submit standalone and well formed patches all the time.  Why would it
make any difference just because they were also commited to a shitty git
tree somewhere else?