From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751947Ab1AVVEe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:04:34 -0500
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:38817 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750897Ab1AVVEe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:04:34 -0500
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:04:05 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
        Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@google.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        davidb@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support
Message-ID: <20110122210405.GC11960@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <AANLkTi=L+MW5-KLP_TKSxhstD8JEtBW=RKci5wSbZsd6@mail.gmail.com> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <1295643762.25868.31.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> <AANLkTi=mvdfpCPefGeDr+eGxpSUr3is5jgugHtgB-m1w@mail.gmail.com> <20110122122018.GC5194@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <AANLkTi=47z21zExtfHq2WYdUdXeC1rNhe7vQsqPkFsMi@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=47z21zExtfHq2WYdUdXeC1rNhe7vQsqPkFsMi@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:22:57AM -0800, Brian Swetland wrote:
> What would be useful would be a reasonable convention for
> acknowledging multiple authors, perhaps something along the lines of:

I asked for the answer to a _specific_ example.  If you can't answer
that example, then you *can't* expect Daniel to either, and it is
utterly unreasonable to demand it of him.