From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
"keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"sliakh.lkml@gmail.com" <sliakh.lkml@gmail.com>,
"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"ak@muc.de" <ak@muc.de>, "davej@redhat.com" <davej@redhat.com>,
"jiang@cs.ncsu.edu" <jiang@cs.ncsu.edu>,
"arjan@infradead.org" <arjan@infradead.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
konrad@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/security] x86: Add NX protection for kernel data
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:31:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110124153109.GA970@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3C3ADB.1020609@free.fr>
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 03:27:39PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> >On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:41:54PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
> >>Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> >>>>- * .data and .bss should always be writable.
> >>>>+ * .data and .bss should always be writable, but xen won't like
> >>>>+ * if we make page table rw (that live in .data or .bss)
> >>>> */
> >>>>+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >>>> if (within(address, (unsigned long)_sdata, (unsigned long)_edata) ||
> >>>>- within(address, (unsigned long)__bss_start, (unsigned long)__bss_stop))
> >>>>- pgprot_val(required) |= _PAGE_RW;
> >>>>+ within(address, (unsigned long)__bss_start, (unsigned long)__bss_stop)) {
> >>>>+ unsigned int level;
> >>>>+ if (lookup_address(address, &level) && (level != PG_LEVEL_4K))
> >>>>+ pgprot_val(forbidden) |= _PAGE_RW;
> >>>>+ }
> >>>>+#endif
> >>>> #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA)
> >>>>
> >>>>fyi, it does make it boot.
> >>>Hold it.. ccache is a wonderful tool but I think I've just "rebuilt" the
> >>>binaries with the .bss HPAGE_ALIGN aligment by mistake, so this path got never
> >>>taken.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Ok,
> >>
> >>ATM I saw the following solution to solve the problem :
> >>1) remove the data/bss check in static_protections, it was introduced by NX patches (64edc8ed). But I am not sure it
> >>is really needed anymore.
> >>2) add ". = ALIGN(HPAGE_SIZE)" somewhere after init section. But if we want not to be allocated in image we
> >>should put it before bss. And if we want to be freed after init, we should put before .init.end.
> >>This mean moving .smp_locks (and .data_nosave when x86 will be added) before init section. I have no idea of the impact.
> >>3) add some logic in arch/x86/xen/mmu.c, that will ignore RW page setting for the page table marked RO.
> >>4) make static_protections take and old_prot argument, and only apply RW .data/.bss requirement if page is already RW.
> >>
> >>If possible I will go for 1).
> >
> >Sounds good. Just send me the patch and I will test it.
>
> Ok, what give you the attached patch.
>
> I don't know if I should give the printk or not.
I would say get rid of the printk. It does not really help the users. Here is an excerpt of
2.6.38-rc2 with this patch:
7.247448] NX-protecting the kernel data: 2412k
[ 7.252489] RO page for 0xc15a0000 in bss/data.
[ 7.253052] RO page for 0xc15a1000 in bss/data.
[ 7.253052] RO page for 0xc15a3000 in bss/data.
[ 7.365104] mv used greatest stack depth: 6616 bytes left
So Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
(I tested on baremetal x86,x86_64 and Xen x86 and x86_64)
>
>
> Matthieu
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> index 8b830ca..eec93c5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
> unsigned long pfn)
> {
> pgprot_t forbidden = __pgprot(0);
> - pgprot_t required = __pgprot(0);
>
> /*
> * The BIOS area between 640k and 1Mb needs to be executable for
> @@ -283,11 +282,13 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
> __pa((unsigned long)__end_rodata) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> pgprot_val(forbidden) |= _PAGE_RW;
> /*
> - * .data and .bss should always be writable.
> + * .data and .bss should always be writable, but xen won't like
> + * if we make page table rw (that live in .data or .bss)
> */
> if (within(address, (unsigned long)_sdata, (unsigned long)_edata) ||
> within(address, (unsigned long)__bss_start, (unsigned long)__bss_stop))
> - pgprot_val(required) |= _PAGE_RW;
> + if ((pgprot_val(prot) & _PAGE_RW) == 0)
> + printk(KERN_INFO "RO page for 0x%lx in bss/data.\n", address);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA)
> /*
> @@ -327,7 +328,6 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
> #endif
>
> prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~pgprot_val(forbidden));
> - prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | pgprot_val(required));
>
> return prot;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-24 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 21:31 [PATCH 2/3 V8] NX protection for kernel data matthieu castet
2010-11-18 14:08 ` [tip:x86/security] x86: Add " tip-bot for Matthieu Castet
2011-01-11 23:31 ` Kees Cook
2011-01-14 20:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-19 21:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-19 22:59 ` matthieu castet
2011-01-19 23:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-20 11:18 ` castet.matthieu
2011-01-20 15:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-20 15:37 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-20 19:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-20 20:23 ` matthieu castet
2011-01-20 21:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-20 21:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-20 21:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-21 21:41 ` matthieu castet
2011-01-22 5:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-23 14:27 ` matthieu castet
2011-01-24 15:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-01-27 16:30 ` Was: [tip:x86/security] x86: Add NX protection for kernel data. Is: don't set RW on RO regions in .bss Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-21 23:20 ` [tip:x86/security] x86: Add NX protection for kernel data Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110124153109.GA970@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jiang@cs.ncsu.edu \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sliakh.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).