From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752249Ab1AZIBX (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:01:23 -0500 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:41774 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750809Ab1AZIBW (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:01:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:17:37 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , linux-mm@kvack.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Christoph Hellwig , Masami Hiramatsu , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , SystemTap , Jim Keniston , Frederic Weisbecker , Andi Kleen , LKML , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2.6.37-rc5-tip 5/20] 5: Uprobes: register/unregister probes. Message-ID: <20110126074737.GA19725@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20101216095714.23751.52601.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <20101216095817.23751.76989.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <1295957745.28776.723.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295957745.28776.723.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra [2011-01-25 13:15:45]: > > + > > + if (atomic_read(&uprobe->ref) == 1) { > > + synchronize_sched(); > > + rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree); > > How is that safe without holding the treelock? Right, Something like this should be good enuf right? if (atomic_read(&uprobe->ref) == 1) { synchronize_sched(); spin_lock_irqsave(&treelock, flags); rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree); spin_lock_irqrestore(&treelock, flags); iput(uprobe->inode); } -- Thanks and Regards Srikar PS: Last time I had goofed up with Linux-mm mailing alias. Hopefully this time it goes to the right list.