From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752901Ab1AZJEe (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:04:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:54656 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752720Ab1AZJEZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:04:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Y5OC70jRBQ3itACqPNS1n3uQidzosMepVS+jyYNUqw4j4yWqXLxaXqd+P05D0o3Ypm oHPe2vZYLTHNHmzYUQLHU7ruDg0W2/VVTQrA9sZ15xTUPPBRmXWjLxwVWbIFtJFmwQfj BIe6R1zSA9ELRVLiBpvTqtINDGfCo0Ddd/ahg= Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:04:19 +0200 From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , X86-ML , Tony Luck , Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , Randy Dunlap , Willy Tarreau , Willy Tarreau , Dirk Hohndel , Dirk.Hohndel@intel.com, IDE-ML , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Borislav Petkov , Arjan van de Ven , Tejun Heo , James Bottomley , Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2][RFC] x86: Saveoops: Reserve low memory and register code Message-ID: <20110126090419.GA24527@laptop> References: <20110125134748.GA10051@laptop> <20110125135326.GC10051@laptop> <4D3F0896.4050006@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D3F0896.4050006@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:29:58AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > However, I'm quite nervous about this -- this patch has *plenty* of real > possibility of wrecking data. > Yes, it does. Keep in mind though that now I'm just prototyping different solutions to a problem I'm facing. I fully understand that in no way this patch is going to be merged in its current state. I'll send another email summarizing the criticism and proposing different paths in a moment. thanks, -- Darwish http://darwish.07.googlepages.com