From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753002Ab1AZJNU (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:13:20 -0500 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:56443 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752097Ab1AZJNS (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:13:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:36:43 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Christoph Hellwig , Masami Hiramatsu , Oleg Nesterov , LKML , SystemTap , Jim Keniston , Frederic Weisbecker , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2.6.37-rc5-tip 8/20] 8: uprobes: mmap and fork hooks. Message-ID: <20110126090643.GI19725@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20101216095714.23751.52601.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <20101216095848.23751.73144.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <1295957741.28776.719.camel@laptop> <1295985926.10144.61.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295985926.10144.61.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt [2011-01-25 15:05:26]: > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 13:15 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 15:28 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > > +static void search_within_subtree(struct rb_node *n, struct inode *inode, > > > + struct list_head *tmp_list) > > > +{ > > > + struct rb_node *p; > > > + > > > + if (p) > > > + __search_within_subtree(p, inode, tmp_list); > > > + > > > + p = n->rb_right; > > > + if (p) > > > + __search_within_subtree(p, inode, tmp_list); > > > +} > > > > Whee recursion FTW!, you just blew your kernel stack :-) > > > > Since you sort inode first, offset second, I think you can simply look > > for the first matching inode entry and simply rb_next() until you don't > > match. > > Not to mention that p is uninitialized. Did this code ever work? I think the original patch that I sent had p initialized. I think it got dropped off by Peter when he replied. Please do confirm. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar