From: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: sys_epoll_wait high CPU load in 2.6.37
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:20:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126172006.GA9568@BohrerMBP.rgmadvisors.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296058409.2899.81.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 05:13:29PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011 à 16:59 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011 à 07:52 -0800, Davide Libenzi a écrit :
> >
> > > For "above", I meant the current epoll expire time calculation, which was
> > > described above in the message ;)
> >
> > Well, problem was not an overflow, but doing a loop 2.000.000 times ;)
> >
> > > The hint for a timespec_add_ms() was because we must be doing something
> > > similar in poll, don't we (/me got no code in front ATM)?
> >
> > Apparently its done differently in poll(), using
> > poll_select_set_timeout() helper.
> >
> >
> > Give me some minutes I'll try to cook an alternate patch
> >
>
> Here is the alternate patch, using poll_select_set_timeout() helper
>
> Thanks
>
> [PATCH v2] epoll: epoll_wait() should not use timespec_add_ns()
>
> commit 95aac7b1cd224f (epoll: make epoll_wait() use the hrtimer range
> feature) added a performance regression because it uses
> timespec_add_ns() with potential very large 'ns' values.
>
> Use poll_select_set_timeout() helper like poll()/select()
>
> Reported-by: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> CC: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>
> CC: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index cc8a9b7..94d887b 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -1125,8 +1125,8 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
> ktime_t expires, *to = NULL;
>
> if (timeout > 0) {
> - ktime_get_ts(&end_time);
> - timespec_add_ns(&end_time, (u64)timeout * NSEC_PER_MSEC);
> + poll_select_set_timeout(&end_time, timeout / MSEC_PER_SEC,
> + NSEC_PER_MSEC * (timeout % MSEC_PER_SEC));
> slack = select_estimate_accuracy(&end_time);
> to = &expires;
> *to = timespec_to_ktime(end_time);
poll_select_set_timeout() jumps through some extra hoops that
aren't necessary in the epoll case so I actually like your previous
patch better.
--
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 0:09 sys_epoll_wait high CPU load in 2.6.37 Simon Kirby
2011-01-26 7:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-26 11:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-26 15:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2011-01-26 15:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-26 15:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2011-01-26 15:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-26 16:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-26 17:20 ` Shawn Bohrer [this message]
2011-01-26 17:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-26 18:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2011-01-26 18:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-26 18:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-28 0:17 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110126172006.GA9568@BohrerMBP.rgmadvisors.com \
--to=shawn.bohrer@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sim@hostway.ca \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox