From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Kazuhisa Ichikawa <ki@epsilou.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why one of the 2 patches to fix "autogroup" sched problem on UP machines is missing in -rc3?
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:46:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110201104602.GA3397@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYw73nixqMtNSDzus2M5RCN2Zy4PzfbPAxtTBC@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:05:23PM +0900, Kazuhisa Ichikawa wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> Now 2.6.38-rc3 is out, and I think one of the 2 patches you wrote to
> fix "autogroup" sched problem on UP machines is missing there.
Actually the merged one hide the initialising problem.
Because when we enqueue a process to an empty group, update_cfs_shares()
will be called, thus tg->se->load is updated.
enqueue_task_fair()
update_cfs_shares()
reweight_entity()
update_load_set()
>
> More precisely, your first patch for kernel/sched.c (titled:?sched:
> tg->se->load should be initialised to tg->shares) is missing, while
> the second one for kernel/sched_fair.c (titled:?sched: Fix poor
> interactivity on UP systems due to group scheduler nice tune bug) is
> in -rc3.
See my above answer.
>
> So what happened to the first patch? Was it superseded and made
> obsolete by the second patch?
Yes.
>
> # Sorry for not replying to your original post. I'm not subscribing to
> linux kernel mailing list.
Thanks for taking care of this issue :)
Thanks,
Yong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-01 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 9:05 Why one of the 2 patches to fix "autogroup" sched problem on UP machines is missing in -rc3? Kazuhisa Ichikawa
2011-02-01 10:46 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-02-01 11:19 ` Kazuhisa Ichikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110201104602.GA3397@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=ki@epsilou.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox