From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix EDD3.0 data verification.
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:38:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110202133858.GJ14984@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110202133035.GF9737@khazad-dum.debian.net>
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:30:36AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Check for nonzero path in edd_has_edd30() has no sense. First, it looks
> > at the wrong memory. Device path starts at offset 30 of the info->params
> > structure which is at offset 8 from the beginning of info structure, but
> > code looks at info + 4 instead. This was correct when code was introduced,
> > but around v2.6.4 three more fields were added to edd_info structure
> > (commit 66b61a5c in history.git). Second, even if it will check correct
> > memory it will always succeed since at offset 30 (params->key) there will
> > be non-zero values otherwise previous check would fail.
>
> Hmm, would that be a reason for boot lockups on some systems ? I've
> seen that happen on Intel D875PBZ and Debian stable (2.6.26). We
> dropped EDD support then.
>
Unlikely. Edd module is not loaded by default and the code that the
patch changes works on in-memory data that was read from BIOS during
boot. It is theoretically possible that BIOS, that works according to
phoenix spec, will do something bad when int13_48 is called with buffer
bigger then 66 bytes, but my patch does not fix that.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 11:21 [PATCH] Fix EDD3.0 data verification Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 13:30 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-02-02 13:38 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2011-02-02 17:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-02 17:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 17:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-02 17:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 17:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 19:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-03 10:04 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110202133858.GJ14984@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox