From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756181Ab1BCKgI (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:36:08 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:45255 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756128Ab1BCKgG (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:36:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:35:48 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov , Greg KH Cc: Andreas Herrmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , x86 , LKML Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AMD microcode fixes Message-ID: <20110203103548.GA14601@elte.hu> References: <20110131133024.GC32230@aftab> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110131133024.GC32230@aftab> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Borislav Petkov wrote: > There's one out-of-tree change to which Greg hasn't > explicitly acked yet but judging by his silence he has nothing against > it :). Hm, the drivers/base/sys.c portion is not particularly small: > arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 6 +- > drivers/base/sys.c | 65 ++++++++++++----- > 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) So i'd really like to have an Acked-by from Greg. Greg, what's your take on this? The patches are here: > Patches survived testing here and were out for review a week ago: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129588278209579 Ingo