From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec()
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:00:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110204150047.GC32190@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203141850.93C2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 02:20:53PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > AFAIK, kexec is used sneak rebooting way when the system face unexpected
> > scenario on some devices. (Some embedded is running very long time, then
> > it can't avoid memory bit corruption. all of reset is a last resort.
> > and a vendor gather logs at periodically checkback).
> >
> > The main purpose of to introduce KMSG_DUMP_KEXEC is to be separate it
> > from KMSG_DUMP_PANIC. At kmsg_dump() initial patch, KMSG_DUMP_PANIC
> > is always called both kdump is configured or not. But it's no good idea
> > the same log is to be appeared when both kexec was successed and failured.
> > Moreover someone don't want any log at kexec phase. They only want logs
> > when real panic (ie kexec failure) route. Then, I've separated it to two.
> > Two separated argument can solve above both requreiment.
>
> A bit additional explanation, An original patch have kmsg_dump(KMSG_DUMP_PANIC)
> callsite at following point. I didn't think it makes either embedded or
> kdump folks happiness. Thus I moved it after crash_kexec().
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
> dump_stack();
> #endif
>
> + kmsg_dump(KMSG_DUMP_PANIC);
> /*
> * If we have crashed and we have a crash kernel loaded let it handle
> * everything else.
> * Do we want to call this before we try to display a message?
> */
> crash_kexec(NULL);
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think to compensate for that somebody introduced additional
kmsg_dump(KEXEC) call inside crash_kexec() and put it under CONFIG
option so that one can change the behavior based on config options.
I think this makes the logic somewhat twisted and an unnecessary call
inside crash_kexec(). So until and unless there is a strong reason we
can get rid of KEXEC event and move kmsg_dump call before crash_kexec()
for now and see how does it go, IMHO.
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 22:59 Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec() Vivek Goyal
2011-02-01 7:19 ` Américo Wang
2011-02-01 7:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-01 7:38 ` Américo Wang
2011-02-01 8:13 ` [Patch] kexec: remove KMSG_DUMP_KEXEC (was Re: Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec()) Américo Wang
2011-02-01 15:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-01 16:06 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-02-03 0:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03 2:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 4:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-26 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-28 1:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-05-30 7:30 ` Américo Wang
2011-05-30 5:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31 21:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 11:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-14 22:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 20:58 ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-05-31 21:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 22:24 ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-06-02 3:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-06-08 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-09 11:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03 0:55 ` Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec() KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03 2:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 4:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03 5:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-04 15:00 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-03-08 1:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-04 14:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 18:38 ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-02-03 21:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-03 22:08 ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-02-04 2:24 ` Américo Wang
2011-02-04 2:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 3:28 ` Américo Wang
2011-02-04 6:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-08 16:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-08 17:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-08 19:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-08 19:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110204150047.GC32190@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jwilson@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox