public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: /proc/<pid>/sched should contain cumulative data for all threads in process
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:11:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110208121144.GA7550@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297156865.13327.57.camel@laptop>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 16:29 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We've got a tool that gathers lots of scheduling data for each process
> > (not task/thread) on the system.
> > 
> > For /proc/<pid>/{stat,io} this is straightforward, as the per-thread
> > values are summed together for the process as a whole.
> > 
> > However, /proc/<pid>/sched only shows the data for the individual thread
> > with the same tid as the pid.  To get a per-process view we need to
> > manually scan all the threads and sum them--and this can get expensive
> > due to all the extra file operations, parsing, etc.
> > 
> > Was this a concious design decision, or just an oversight?  Would a
> > patch converting it to whole-process values be accepted or is it enough
> > of a standard interface that we can't break existing apps that expect
> > the current behaviour?
> 
> I'd as soon remove all that stuff than extend it, its an abi liability,
> esp since you're talking about tools parsing this stuff.

So assuming a tool would want to capture such stats of the system, what would be its 
options? Could we do all this via system-wide counters and perf stat alike cheap, 
transparent gathering without having to patch/rebuild the kernel?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-08 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07 22:29 RFC: /proc/<pid>/sched should contain cumulative data for all threads in process Chris Friesen
2011-02-08  9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 12:11   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-02-08 13:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 15:14       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-09 17:28       ` Chris Friesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110208121144.GA7550@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=chris.friesen@genband.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox