From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] memcg: operate on page quantities internally
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110210124253.GO27110@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110210085034.a6c5d703.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:50:34AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:01:49 +0100
> Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> > If I did not miss anything, this should leave only res_counter and
> > user-visible stuff in bytes. The ABI probably won't change, so next
> > up is converting res_counter to operate on page quantities.
>
> Hmm, I think this should be done but think this should be postphoned, too.
> Because, IIUC, some guys will try to discuss charging against kernel objects
> in the next mm-summit. IMHO, it will be done against PAGE not against
> Object even if we do kernel object accouting. So this patch is okay for me.
> But I think it's better to go ahead after we confirm the way we go.
> How do you think ?
That makes sense, let's leave res_counter alone until we have hashed
this out.
> Anyway, I welcome this patch.
Thanks for reviewing,
Hannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-09 11:01 [patch 0/4] memcg: operate on page quantities internally Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 11:01 ` [patch 1/4] memcg: keep only one charge cancelling function Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 23:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-10 12:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 11:01 ` [patch 2/4] memcg: convert per-cpu stock from bytes to page granularity Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 23:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-09 11:01 ` [patch 3/4] memcg: convert uncharge batching " Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 23:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-09 11:01 ` [patch 4/4] memcg: unify charge/uncharge quantities to units of pages Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 23:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-10 12:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 21:37 ` [patch 0/4] memcg: operate on page quantities internally Andrew Morton
2011-02-10 12:40 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-09 23:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-10 12:42 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110210124253.GO27110@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox