public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Fix thread_map event synthesizing in top and record
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:00:00 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110210200000.GF20676@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49aai38yqa.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

Em Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:40:29PM -0500, Jeff Moyer escreveu:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> writes:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > Jeff Moyer reported these messages:
> >
> >   Warning:  ... trying to fall back to cpu-clock-ticks
> >
> > couldn't open /proc/-1/status
> > couldn't open /proc/-1/maps
> > [ls output]
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.008 MB perf.data (~363 samples) ]
> >
> > That lead me and David Ahern to see that something was fishy on the thread
> > synthesizing routines, at least for the case where the workload is started
> > from 'perf record', as -1 is the default for target_tid in 'perf record --tid'
> > parameter, so somehow we were trying to synthesize the PERF_RECORD_MMAP and
> > PERF_RECORD_COMM events for the thread -1, a bug.
> >
> > So I investigated this and noticed that when we introduced support for
> > recording a process and its threads using --pid some bugs were introduced and
> > that the way to fix it was to instead of passing the target_tid to the event
> > synthesizing routines we should better pass the thread_map that has the list of
> > threads for a --pid or just the single thread for a --tid.
> 
> Thanks for looking into this, acme.  Honestly, I can't for the life of
> me figure out from your description how this problem would have affected
> systems.  The fix makes the warnings go away, but I am still left with
> the hung system I originally reported.

I wasn't looking at that part, as described, I looked just at the
/proc/-1/status part, that -1. I.e. the part I hack on, the tools.
 
> So, what does this patch actually fix?  And do you or others have any
> interest in trying to work out why perf is hanging my system?

Peter?

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-10 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-10 18:51 [GIT PULL 0/1] perf/urgent fix for record and top Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-10 18:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Fix thread_map event synthesizing in top and record Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-10 19:40   ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-10 20:00     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2011-02-10 20:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11  7:05 ` [GIT PULL 0/1] perf/urgent fix for record and top Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110210200000.GF20676@ghostprotocols.net \
    --to=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox