From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chad Talbott <ctalbott@google.com>,
Divyesh Shah <dpshah@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v4] cfq-iosched: CFQ group hierarchical scheduling and use_hierarchy interface
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:10:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110214181027.GI13097@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D589F81.2050408@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:20:33AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:47:45PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> >> CFQ group hierarchical scheduling and use_hierarchy interface.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Gui,
> >
> > I have done a quick high level review. Some minor comments inline.
> >
> > [..]
> >> struct cfq_data {
> >> struct request_queue *queue;
> >> - /* Root service tree for cfq_groups */
> >> - struct cfq_rb_root grp_service_tree;
> >> struct cfq_group root_group;
> >>
> >> + /* cfq group schedule in flat or hierarchy manner. */
> >> + bool use_hierarchy;
> >> +
> >
> > This seems to be redundant now? Nobody is using it?
> >
> >> /*
> >> * The priority currently being served
> >> */
> >> @@ -246,6 +251,9 @@ struct cfq_data {
> >> unsigned long workload_expires;
> >> struct cfq_group *serving_group;
> >>
> >> + /* Service tree for cfq group flat scheduling mode. */
> >> + struct cfq_rb_root grp_service_tree;
> >
> > Above comment is misleading. This service tree is now used both for
> > flat as well as hierarhical mode.
> >
> > [..]
> >> static void
> >> cfq_group_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)
> >> {
> >> - struct cfq_rb_root *st = &cfqd->grp_service_tree;
> >> struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe;
> >> - struct cfq_entity *__cfqe;
> >> struct rb_node *n;
> >> + struct cfq_entity *entity;
> >> + struct cfq_rb_root *st;
> >> + struct cfq_group *__cfqg;
> >>
> >> cfqg->nr_cfqq++;
> >> +
> >> if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&cfqe->rb_node))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> /*
> >> - * Currently put the group at the end. Later implement something
> >> - * so that groups get lesser vtime based on their weights, so that
> >> - * if group does not loose all if it was not continously backlogged.
> >> + * Enqueue this group and its ancestors onto their service tree.
> >> */
> >> - n = rb_last(&st->rb);
> >> - if (n) {
> >> - __cfqe = rb_entry_entity(n);
> >> - cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime + CFQ_IDLE_DELAY;
> >> - } else
> >> - cfqe->vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime;
> >> + while (cfqe) {
> >> + if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&cfqe->rb_node))
> >> + return;
> >>
> >> - cfq_entity_service_tree_add(st, cfqe);
> >> + /*
> >> + * Currently put the group at the end. Later implement
> >> + * something so that groups get lesser vtime based on
> >> + * their weights, so that if group does not loose all
> >> + * if it was not continously backlogged.
> >> + */
> >
> > Can we use vdisktime boost logic for groups also? I think it can be a separate
> > patch in the series (the last one). Keeping it as a separate patch will
> > also help you to coordinate with chad's patch.
> >
> >> + st = cfqe->service_tree;
> >
> > Group entity set their service tree when they get allocated and retain
> > this pointer even when they get deleted from serivce tree. Queue entities
> > seem to have it NULL when they get deleted from service tree and it
> > gets set again when queue is getting inserted. It would be nice if we
> > can fix this discrepancy and keep it consistent. I think clearing up
> > cfqe->service_tree is a better idea and then calculate it again for
> > group also.
>
> Vivek,
>
> Currently, cfq queue might change workload type and io class, so we need to recalculate
> its service_tree. But for cfq groups, IMHO we don't need to add this complexity for the
> time being.
> I think we can add this change as soon as different io classes or workload types are
> introduced. How do you think?
Ok, that's fine.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-14 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D51ED26.8050809@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-02-10 7:46 ` [PATCH 1/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ queue Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 2/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ group Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 3/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 19:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-12 1:20 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 16:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-15 1:53 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-15 14:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-16 1:06 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 18:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-15 1:46 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-18 6:04 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-18 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-21 1:13 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-21 5:55 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-21 15:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-14 23:32 ` Justin TerAvest
2011-02-15 1:44 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-15 14:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 4/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Extract some common code of service tree handling for CFQ queue and CFQ group Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 5/6 v4] cfq-iosched: CFQ group hierarchical scheduling and use_hierarchy interface Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 20:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-12 2:21 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 18:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-15 2:38 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-15 14:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-16 1:44 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-17 1:22 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-16 17:22 ` Divyesh Shah
2011-02-16 17:28 ` Divyesh Shah
2011-02-16 18:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-14 3:20 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 18:10 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-02-17 0:31 ` Justin TerAvest
2011-02-17 1:21 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-17 17:36 ` Justin TerAvest
2011-02-18 1:14 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-17 10:39 ` Alan Cox
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 6/6 v4] blkio-cgroup: Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface Gui Jianfeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110214181027.GI13097@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox